Equipment State Classification Using Periodic Anomaly Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing equipment monitoring systems rely on threshold values for detecting abnormalities, which can be operator-dependent and prone to errors, and may not accurately classify measurement data when the equipment state changes or includes noise, leading to inaccurate determination results.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses multiple classification models learned from measurement data for each period to determine the state of equipment as normal or abnormal, taking a logical product of classification results and generating new models based on recent data to adapt to changing conditions, thereby eliminating the need for threshold values and improving accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If threshold values are used for detecting abnormalities, then the detection method is simple, but the determination accuracy deteriorates due to operator dependence and inability to handle changing equipment states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monitoring system into multiple classification models, each trained on measurement data from different periods. This segmentation allows the system to capture changing equipment states without requiring a complete system redesign, resolving the contradiction between accuracy and complexity by breaking down the problem into manageable periodic segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by periodically retraining classification models with new measurement data. This dynamic approach allows the system to automatically adjust to changing equipment states and noise patterns, improving determination accuracy without relying on static threshold values that require manual adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple classification models are used for each period, then the determination accuracy improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidmodel management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action by training new classification models at regular intervals using measurement data from each period. This periodic model generation and evaluation approach systematically manages multiple models, improving accuracy through diverse temporal perspectives while maintaining organized model lifecycle management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where classification results from multiple models are evaluated, and the best-performing models are selected for deployment. This feedback loop allows the system to automatically refine model selection based on performance metrics, improving accuracy while managing complexity through data-driven model optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If threshold values are used for abnormality detection, then the system is easy to operate, but the reliability deteriorates due to operator dependence and error-prone threshold setting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination reliabilityVSAvoidsystem operability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables self-service by automatically training classification models on historical measurement data without requiring manual threshold setting. The system autonomously learns normal and abnormal patterns from the data, improving reliability by eliminating operator-dependent threshold selection while maintaining ease of operation through automated model generation and deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the approach from fixed threshold parameters to dynamic classification parameters learned from data. By changing from static threshold values to adaptive classification models that evolve with equipment states, the system improves reliability while maintaining operational simplicity through automated parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If classification models are regenerated for each period, then the adaptability to changing conditions improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing statesVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training classification models on historical measurement data during off-peak periods. This advance preparation allows the system to have ready-to-use models that can be quickly deployed when needed, improving adaptability to changing conditions while minimizing the time loss during actual monitoring operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by selectively training and evaluating only the most relevant classification models based on current equipment states and data quality. This selective approach reduces the overall processing time while maintaining high adaptability by focusing computational resources on the most impactful models rather than processing all possible models equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250005454A1Apparatus, method, and computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 YOKOGAWA ELECTRIC CORP
  • US20250005454A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005454A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005454A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an apparatus including: an acquisition unit which acquires measurement data indicating a state of a target; a supply unit which supplies the measurement data acquired by the acquisition unit to a plurality of classification models respectively learned by learning data, which includes measurement data in a period in which the state of the target is normal, for periods different from each other, the plurality of classification models classifying measurement data as either normal or abnormal in response to the measurement data being input; and a determination unit which determines the state of the target as either normal or abnormal based on a plurality of classification results output from the plurality of classification models.