Erasure-Coded File System Compaction with In-Place Valid Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional erasure-coding-based compaction mechanisms in distributed file systems are inefficient in terms of computing resources and network bandwidth, and create a burden for garbage collection due to the need to recycle and re-write large amounts of invalidated data.

Innovation Solution

The system regroups valid data into new chunks with error-correction-coding protection, maintaining the original physical location of valid data slices and writing new data and parity into the same storage nodes as the original, reducing the amount of data to be written and decoupling compaction from garbage collection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional erasure-coding-based compaction mechanisms are used to merge chunks with holes, then data compaction is achieved, but computing resources and network bandwidth are consumed inefficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata compaction efficiencyVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary operations for compaction by identifying and processing only the invalid data portions rather than moving all data. The system selectively reads only invalid data slices from source chunks and writes only the necessary valid data and new parity, leaving valid data in place. This extraction approach minimizes unnecessary data movement and computing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The compaction process is segmented into distinct operations: identifying invalid data slices, reading only those specific slices, determining target locations, and writing only the necessary data. This segmentation allows the system to process compaction in discrete, optimized steps rather than moving entire chunks of data, reducing overall computing resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If conventional erasure-coding-based compaction mechanisms are used to merge chunks with holes, then data compaction is achieved, but network bandwidth is consumed inefficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata compaction efficiencyVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the minimal necessary data for compaction by reading only invalid data slices and writing only valid data and new parity. This extraction strategy significantly reduces the volume of data transmitted over the network compared to conventional methods that move entire chunks, thereby reducing network bandwidth consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification of invalid data slices before initiating data transfer operations. By pre-determining which data slices need to be moved and where they should go, the system avoids unnecessary network traffic and prepares the compaction process in advance, reducing overall bandwidth consumption during the actual compaction execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If conventional compaction mechanisms are used, then chunks with holes are merged, but a burden is created for garbage collection in physical drives due to large amounts of invalidated data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechunk merging efficiencyVSAvoidgarbage collection burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the minimal necessary data for compaction by identifying and moving only invalid data slices rather than invalidating large portions of data. This selective approach reduces the total volume of data that requires garbage collection, thereby reducing the burden on physical drives while still achieving effective chunk merging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The compaction process applies local quality optimization by treating different data slices differently based on their validity status. Valid data slices are left in place without invalidation, while only invalid slices are processed for relocation. This localized approach minimizes the overall impact on garbage collection operations compared to blanket invalidation strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11150986B2Efficient compaction on log-structured distributed file system using erasure coding for resource consumption reduction
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 CLOUD INTELLIGENCE ASSETS HOLDING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US11150986B2 patent drawing
  • US11150986B2 patent drawing
  • US11150986B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment described herein provides a system and method for data compaction in a storage system comprising a plurality of storage nodes. During operation, in response to determining that data compaction is triggered, the system regroups valid data from a first set of data chunks stored in the storage system into a second set of data chunks such that a respective data chunk from the second set of data chunks comprises contiguous valid data slices. The system further performs error-correction-coding protection on the second set of data chunks. A physical location associated with a respective valid data slice remains unchanged subsequent to the error-correction-coding protection.