Iterative Erasure-LDPC Decoding for Fault-Tolerant Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current digital decoding systems in hyperscale data clusters face inefficiencies due to linear storage growth in replicated data schemes and increased computational complexity in erasure coded pools, leading to underutilization of hardware and reduced response times from hard-decision LDPC decoding.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a soft-decision erasure decoder and combining it with LDPC decoders and MAP/SOVA detectors for iterative error detection and confidence-based symbol assignment, distributing decoding work between global erasure coding and drive-level error correction to predict and correct erasures proactively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If data is replicated across drives to ensure fault tolerance, then reliability is improved, but storage quantity increases linearly and becomes impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault toleranceVSAvoidstorage quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses erasure coding to create redundant data representations through mathematical encoding rather than simple replication. Data is encoded into multiple fragments with parity information, allowing recovery from failures without storing complete copies of the original data, thus achieving reliability with reduced storage overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the storage architecture from replication (1:N copies) to erasure coding (1:N fragments with redundancy). By transforming the data representation parameters and using algebraic codes, the system maintains fault tolerance while significantly reducing the storage quantity required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If hard-decision LDPC decoding is used for error correction, then device complexity is reduced, but response time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding complexityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the decoding process into two distinct stages: first LDPC decoding for drive-level error correction, then RS decoding for global erasure recovery. This segmentation allows each decoder to operate independently on its specific code type, optimizing performance for each stage while maintaining overall system efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic action by conditionally executing RS decoding only when LDPC decoding fails or indicates potential erasures. This periodic engagement of the more complex RS decoder based on LDPC feedback maintains low average complexity while ensuring high-speed response when errors are detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If RS decoding is skipped when drives produce error-free data, then productivity is improved, but reliability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding efficiencyVSAvoiderror detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where LDPC decoders report their decoding status and confidence levels to the RS decoder. This feedback loop allows the system to intelligently determine when RS decoding is necessary, maintaining reliability by catching errors that LDPC missed while improving productivity by avoiding unnecessary RS decoding operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary LDPC decoding first to detect and correct drive-level errors before potentially engaging RS decoding. This preliminary action filters out many errors early, allowing the system to skip expensive RS decoding when not needed while maintaining the ability to recover from more severe errors that require the full power of RS decoding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10530395B2Iterative message-passing decoding with global code embedded with local code in time-division manner for fault tolerance improvement
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 CLOUD INTELLIGENCE ASSETS HOLDING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US10530395B2 patent drawing
  • US10530395B2 patent drawing
  • US10530395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed embodiments are directed to systems, devices, and methods for iterative message-passing decoding. In one embodiment, a method is disclosed comprising decoding a first codeword at a storage device using a detector and a decoder, the first codeword comprising a set of symbols from a first set of codewords; assigning, via the decoding, a set of confidence levels for each symbol in the first codeword; transmitting, by the storage device, the confidence levels to an iterative decoder; generating, by the iterative decoder, a second codeword based on the set of confidence levels, the second codeword excluding at least one symbol in the set of symbols; and iteratively decoding, by the iterative decoder, the second codeword using an erasure decoder; and transmitting, by the iterative decoder, soft information generated by the erasure decoder to the storage device for subsequent decoding by the storage device.