ERβ Selective Cycloalkane Compounds for Memory Consolidation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ERβ agonists face challenges in selectivity for ERβ over ERα, with existing compounds often having synthetic and stereochemistry issues, and there is a need for more effective treatments for age-related memory decline in post-menopausal women without the risks associated with ERα agonist activity.

Innovation Solution

Development of substituted (4′-hydroxylphenyl) cycloalkane and (4′-hydroxylphenyl) cycloalkene compounds, such as ISP358-2, which exhibit high selectivity for ERβ over ERα, formulated as pharmaceutical compositions to treat diseases associated with ERβ activity, including memory consolidation issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing ERβ agonist compounds are used, then some ERβ activity is achieved, but selectivity for ERβ over ERα is insufficient and synthetic complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveERβ selectivityVSAvoidsynthetic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the estrogen receptor ligand into two distinct functional segments: a phenolic ring system (A-ring) that provides ERβ selectivity through specific hydrogen bonding interactions, and a cycloalkane or cycloalkene core (B-ring equivalent) that provides structural stability and metabolic stability. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized independently for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and simplifies the essential pharmacophore elements from complex natural estrogens and existing synthetic ERβ agonists. By removing unnecessary aromatic rings and focusing on the critical phenolic A-ring and cycloalkane B-ring interaction, the patent creates a simplified molecule that maintains ERβ selectivity while reducing synthetic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If ERα agonist activity is used to treat memory decline, then memory consolidation is enhanced, but peripheral toxicity and cancer risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory consolidation efficacyVSAvoidperipheral toxicity and cancer risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating molecular features that are specifically recognized by ERβ but not by ERα. The phenolic ring system with specific substitution patterns and the cycloalkane core create a local molecular environment that selectively activates ERβ in the hippocampus while avoiding ERα activation in peripheral tissues, thus achieving memory benefits without peripheral toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of non-selective estrogen therapy (which causes peripheral toxicity and cancer risk through ERα activation) into a benefit by designing a molecule that selectively activates only ERβ. This transforms the problem of ERα-mediated side effects into a solution where only the beneficial ERβ pathway is activated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If complex aromatic ring systems are used in ERβ agonists, then binding affinity is improved, but synthetic difficulty and stereochemistry issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding affinityVSAvoidsynthetic ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of starting with complex aromatic ring systems and trying to simplify them, the patent inverts the approach by starting with a simple cycloalkane or cycloalkene core and adding only the essential phenolic A-ring functionality. This inversion of the synthetic planning approach makes the synthesis more straightforward while maintaining binding affinity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental structural parameter from aromatic B-ring systems to saturated or unsaturated cycloalkane/cycloalkene cores. This parameter change maintains the essential pharmacological interactions at the phenolic A-ring while dramatically simplifying the rest of the molecule, making it easier to synthesize and control stereochemistry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240327421A1Substituted (4-Hydroxyphenyl)Cycloalkane and (4-Hydroxyphenyl)Cycloalkene Compounds and Uses Thereof as Selective Agonists of the Estrogen Receptor Beta Isoform for Enhanced Memory Consolidation
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 CU VENTURES INC
  • US20240327421A1 patent drawing
  • US20240327421A1 patent drawing
  • US20240327421A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are substituted (4′-hydroxylphenyl) cycloalkane compounds and substituted (4′-hydroxylphenyl) cycloalkene compounds and there use as selective agonists of the estrogen receptor beta isoform (ERβ). The disclosed compounds may be formulated as pharmaceutical compositions and administered for treating diseases associated with ER activity, such as neurological, psychiatric, and/or cell proliferative diseases and disorders as well as for enhancing memory consolidation in subjects in need thereof.