Ergonomic Integral Handle with Semi-Enclosed Recess

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing integral handles, particularly non-through handles, lack ergonomic design, leading to discomfort and strain on the user's hand and wrist, while also presenting manufacturing and logistical challenges.

Innovation Solution

A molded article with a holding means featuring a rounded cross-section, a radius greater than 7.5 mm, a width between 50 mm and 60 mm, and a top surface extending at an angle of at least 50°, forming a semi-enclosed recess that allows comfortable gripping and transition from pick-up to grip position without creating pressure points, enabling rotation while minimizing strain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a non-through handle is used, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but ergonomics deteriorate causing hand and wrist strain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidergonomics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The handle incorporates a rounded cross-section with a radius r greater than 7.5 mm, creating a semi-enclosed recess that conforms to the natural curvature of human fingers. This curved geometry allows comfortable gripping without requiring the complex through-handle structure, thus maintaining manufacturing simplicity while improving ergonomics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies precise dimensional parameters: width w between 50-60 mm, radius r > 7.5 mm, and top surface angle a ≥ 50°. These parameter optimizations create an ergonomic profile that distributes pressure evenly across fingers, solving the ergonomics problem while keeping the handle as a simple non-through integral structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If hooks are generated to improve grip, then gripping capability is enhanced, but wrist strain increases and production line problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip capabilityVSAvoidwrist strain
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of sharp hooks that concentrate force and cause wrist strain, the patent employs a rounded cross-section with radius r > 7.5 mm. This curved geometry naturally guides fingers into a comfortable grip position while distributing mechanical stress across broader contact areas, eliminating the harmful wrist strain associated with hook designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a third dimension by creating a semi-enclosed recess through the rounded cross-section geometry. This recessed volume allows fingers to nestle comfortably within the handle contour, providing ergonomic support without requiring the aggressive hook geometry that causes wrist strain and production line entanglement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If a through handle is used, then ergonomics are improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveergonomicsVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rounded cross-section with radius r > 7.5 mm creates a semi-enclosed recess that provides through-handle-like ergonomic benefits. This curved geometry allows fingers to wrap around and find natural resting positions, achieving comparable ergonomics to through handles while maintaining the simpler non-through integral structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

By optimizing specific parameters (width 50-60 mm, radius > 7.5 mm, angle ≥ 50°), the patent achieves ergonomic performance comparable to through handles. These parameter adjustments transform the simple non-through structure into an ergonomically superior handle without adding manufacturing complexity or requiring post-molding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10086969B2Article with ergonomic integral handle
Publication Date: 2018.10.02 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US10086969B2 patent drawing
  • US10086969B2 patent drawing
  • US10086969B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a molded article with a body having a top and a bottom; an opening proximal to the top; and a handle integrally located on at least one side of the body and positioned between the top and the bottom. The handle having at least one innermost surface, one external surface and at least one transition surface positioned between the innermost surface and the external surface, the handle forming at least one semi-enclosed recess positioned between the external surface and the body.