Autonomous Vehicle Error Braking With Backup Brake Rerouting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fully automated or autonomous vehicles face challenges in safely continuing their journey when the main brake system fails, as occupants cannot react quickly enough to critical errors, and secondary brake systems may also fail, leading to unsafe conditions and schedule delays.

Innovation Solution

A method and safety system that switches the vehicle to an error mode, activating multiple backup brake systems and navigation functions to ensure safe and efficient travel, including reducing drive unit performance and rerouting to avoid hazardous conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the main brake system fails in a fully automated vehicle, then the vehicle must switch to backup brake systems to maintain safety, but this leads to reduced braking performance and limited driving conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system reliabilityVSAvoiddriving efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring multiple backup brake systems (secondary and tertiary) that are activated in advance when the main brake system fails. The control unit detects brake system failures and automatically switches to appropriate backup systems, ensuring safety is maintained without requiring manual intervention from the driver or passenger.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The brake system is segmented into multiple independent subsystems (main brake system, secondary brake system, and tertiary brake system), each capable of providing braking function. This segmentation allows the vehicle to continue operating safely even when one subsystem fails, as other segments can compensate for the failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the vehicle continues traveling with a failed main brake system using backup systems, then safety is maintained, but critical driving conditions may overtax the backup systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safetyVSAvoidoverloading backup brake systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors the operational status and performance of both the main brake system and backup brake systems. When a failure is detected, the control unit activates the appropriate backup system and adjusts vehicle operations based on real-time feedback about brake system performance, ensuring that backup systems are not overloaded beyond their capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its configuration based on operational conditions. When the main brake system fails, the vehicle transitions to using backup systems with modified operating parameters. The control unit adapts the braking strategy to match the reduced capabilities of backup systems, preventing overloading while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the vehicle is equipped with multiple backup brake systems to handle critical errors, then safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system safetyVSAvoidbrake system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The backup brake systems are designed with multi-functionality to serve multiple purposes. The secondary brake system can function as both a backup to the main brake system and as a primary braking system when needed. The control unit manages these systems universally, activating appropriate subsystems based on failure conditions, which reduces the need for completely separate dedicated backup systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Extent of automation

If the driver is removed from driving tasks in fully automated mode, then automation level is improved, but the driver cannot react to critical brake failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving automation levelVSAvoidresponse to critical errors
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle's brake system implements self-service through automated failure detection and backup system activation. The control unit continuously monitors brake system status and automatically switches to backup systems when failures occur, eliminating the need for human intervention. This allows full automation while maintaining safety through self-managing backup capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12371036B2Method for operating a motor vehicle using an error brake safety system
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • US12371036B2 patent drawing
  • US12371036B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a motor vehicle that, due to an error in a main brake system of the motor vehicle, is switched by means of a control circuit from a normal mode to an error mode in which a performance of a drive unit of the motor vehicle is reduced, and at least one navigation function of the motor vehicle is activated. The invention provides that an additional function of the motor vehicle is activated in error mode by means of the control circuit. Moreover, the invention relates to a safety system that is designed to perform the above method, as well as to a motor vehicle equipped with such a safety system.