Error Severity Module for E-Commerce Revenue Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating errors in computer systems, particularly e-commerce applications, are inefficient due to the time-consuming nature of parsing output logs, lack of context, and difficulty in prioritizing errors based on their impact on users, leading to incomplete error reporting and inefficient resource allocation for correction.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize an error-severity module to rank errors based on their severity, incorporating factors like frequency and user impact, and generate user interfaces showing estimated revenue loss and priority for correction, leveraging machine learning and session data to identify and predict errors across multiple systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If developers manually parse output logs to identify errors, then they can detect errors, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidtime to parse and identify errors
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated error detection and severity assessment that operates without manual intervention. The error-severity module automatically parses logs, identifies errors, determines their severity levels, and prioritizes them for correction, eliminating the need for developers to manually analyze output logs while maintaining comprehensive error detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of log parsing with an automated computational system. The error-severity module uses algorithmic processing to automatically extract, analyze, and prioritize errors from system logs, substituting human developers' manual efforts with an efficient automated mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If all reported errors are treated as critical, then no important errors are missed, but developers waste time on less-critical fixes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of error coverageVSAvoidefficiency of error correction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different quality levels of response to different errors based on their severity. The error-severity module categorizes errors into distinct severity levels (critical, high, medium, low) and provides prioritized guidance for correction, allowing developers to focus their efforts on the most impactful errors while maintaining awareness of all errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of error prioritization by introducing a severity assessment mechanism. Instead of treating all errors uniformly, the system dynamically assigns severity levels and priority scores to errors based on their impact on system functionality and user experience, enabling differentiated response strategies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If users report all errors they encounter, then complete error data is collected, but the volume of data becomes challenging to parse and analyze

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of error reportingVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The error-severity module extracts only the most relevant and critical information from the large volume of user-reported errors. It automatically filters, aggregates, and prioritizes error data, extracting key patterns and severity indicators while discarding redundant information, thereby simplifying the data processing burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Manufacturing precision

If developers focus on fixing all errors equally, then comprehensive bug fixes are achieved, but resource allocation becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethoroughness of error correctionVSAvoidresource allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment and prioritization of errors before developers begin correction work. The error-severity module pre-evaluates all reported errors, assigns severity levels, and creates a prioritized correction queue, allowing developers to efficiently allocate their resources to the most critical errors first while ensuring comprehensive coverage over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11574274B2System and method for evaluating application errors in e-commerce applications
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 NOIBU TECH INC
  • US11574274B2 patent drawing
  • US11574274B2 patent drawing
  • US11574274B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for tracking and ranking errors in computer systems may be used in e-commerce applications in order to identify errors that occur in e-commerce user sessions along with an estimate of potential lost revenues resulting from the error. The errors and associated lost revenues may allow prioritizing of which errors to address.