Electric Reaction Technology for Hydrogen Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing hydrogen from hydrocarbons result in significant carbon dioxide emissions, which contribute to global climate change, and are economically complex and expensive, with existing processes either losing the carbon heating value or requiring high capital costs for equipment and energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

An Electric Reaction Technology (ERT) system decomposes hydrocarbon gas into hydrogen and carbon solids, using multiple heating zones with meshed wire components to achieve efficient decomposition and separation, allowing for the recycling of heat and hydrogen to optimize the process, thereby minimizing carbon dioxide emissions and reducing capital costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If hydrocarbons are decomposed to produce hydrogen through conventional methods (steam reforming, partial oxidation), then hydrogen is produced, but significant carbon dioxide emissions are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen productionVSAvoidcarbon dioxide emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts carbon from the hydrocarbon decomposition process by separating it as solid carbon deposits rather than converting it to carbon dioxide gas. This is achieved through controlled thermal decomposition where carbon is removed from the reaction stream as a solid byproduct, leaving hydrogen as the primary gaseous product. The carbon can then be captured and sequestered or utilized, preventing its conversion to harmful CO2 emissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the thermal parameters of the decomposition process to favor carbon deposition rather than oxidation. By controlling temperature, residence time, and atmospheric conditions (specifically limiting oxygen exposure), the process parameters are optimized to produce solid carbon instead of carbon dioxide. This involves maintaining temperatures sufficient for decomposition but managing oxygen levels to prevent complete oxidation of the carbon.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If carbon is separated and removed from the process, then carbon dioxide emissions are reduced, but the heating value of carbon combustion is lost requiring twice the fuel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon dioxide emissionsVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent recovers the carbon produced during decomposition as a valuable byproduct rather than discarding it as waste. The solid carbon deposits are captured and can be sold as a commercial product (such as carbon black or activated carbon) or used as a fuel source. This recovery approach converts what would be a loss of heating value into an additional revenue stream or energy source, offsetting the energy input requirements of the decomposition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Quantity of substance

If conventional steam reforming and water gas shift processes are used to produce hydrogen, then hydrogen is produced economically, but carbon dioxide is generated as a byproduct

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen productionVSAvoidcarbon dioxide emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the multi-step chemical process system (steam reforming followed by water gas shift reactions) with a direct thermal decomposition process. Instead of using catalysts and multiple reaction stages that inherently produce CO2, the invention uses controlled thermal breakdown of hydrocarbons to directly yield hydrogen and solid carbon. This substitution eliminates the need for oxygen-based oxidation reactions that generate carbon dioxide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-generated harmful factors

If carbon solids are recovered and marketed or stored, then carbon dioxide emissions are reduced, but additional separation and processing equipment is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon dioxide emissionsVSAvoidseparation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the decomposition process into distinct zones: a reaction zone where hydrocarbons decompose, a separation zone where hydrogen and carbon are divided, and a carbon removal zone where solid carbon is extracted. This segmentation allows each function to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall separation task by breaking it into manageable stages rather than requiring a single complex separation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ERT system effectively produces hydrogen with high purity and low capital costs, achieving breakeven economics with affordable electricity, and allows for the production of carbon solids that can be marketed or stored, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and operational expenses.

Implementation Method 1

a hydrocarbon gas is fed into an electric reaction technology system to decompose the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen gas and carbon solids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

flowing the heated hydrogen gas and any remaining carbon solids and hydrocarbon gas through the heat exchanger to heat additional incoming hydrocarbon gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

The hydrogen gas and any remaining carbon solids and hydrocarbon gas then flow through a phase separation system, such as a scrubber, filtration or drying system for example, to remove substantially all of the carbon, leaving hydrogen product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Sedimentation

Data Source

PatentUS7563525B2Electric reaction technology for fuels processing
Publication Date: 2009.07.21 EGT ENTERPRISES
  • US7563525B2 patent drawing
  • US7563525B2 patent drawing
  • US7563525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for producing hydrogen is disclosed wherein a hydrocarbon gas is fed into an electric reaction technology system to decompose the hydrocarbon gas to hydrogen gas and carbon solids. The electric reaction technology system comprises one or more heating zones, wherein each heating zone comprises one or more heating stations and each heating station comprises one or more heating screens followed by a final near-equilibrium attainment zone without additional heat input. After passing the hydrogen gas through the electric reaction technology system the hydrogen gas and any remaining carbon solids and hydrocarbon gas are cooled. The hydrogen gas and any remaining carbon solids and hydrocarbon gas flow through a scrubber, filter, drier or other phase separation system to remove substantially all of the carbon, leaving hydrogen product. The electric reaction technology system can also be used to pyrolyze hydrocarbons.