ERV Effectiveness Monitoring for Energy And Moisture Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Energy recovery ventilation (ERV) systems in buildings face challenges in effectively calculating and indicating their efficiency and potential maintenance needs, leading to inefficiencies and increased utility expenses.

Innovation Solution

The system calculates the saturated water vapor pressure, air humidity ratio, degree of saturation, and enthalpy to determine latent, sensible, and total effectiveness, using equations and sensor data to provide real-time performance metrics and maintenance alerts through a graphical user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If energy recovery ventilation systems operate without effectiveness calculation and monitoring, then system complexity is reduced, but energy efficiency and maintenance optimization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors temperature, humidity, and airflow parameters, calculates effectiveness metrics, and provides feedback through user interfaces and maintenance alerts. This closed-loop feedback enables real-time optimization of energy recovery performance without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The ERV system performs self-diagnosis and self-monitoring by automatically calculating effectiveness metrics from sensor data, tracking performance degradation, and generating maintenance alerts. This self-service capability reduces the need for external monitoring systems while maintaining high energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of energy

If effectiveness calculation and monitoring are implemented, then energy efficiency and maintenance optimization improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions including effectiveness calculation, performance monitoring, maintenance scheduling, and user notification within a single integrated platform. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by consolidating what could be separate systems into one unified solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual effectiveness assessment and maintenance scheduling with automated electronic calculations and digital alerts. Sensors, processors, and software algorithms substitute for manual mechanical inspection and calculation methods, reducing operational complexity while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If real-time effectiveness monitoring is implemented, then maintenance timing optimization improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance timing optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously tracks effectiveness metrics and predicts when performance degradation will occur, generating maintenance alerts before actual failures happen. This preliminary action approach allows proactive maintenance scheduling based on predicted performance thresholds rather than reactive responses to failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise estimation of energy transfer and moisture recovery, enabling users to optimize system performance, reduce energy consumption, and schedule maintenance, thereby lowering utility expenses and improving indoor air quality.

Implementation Method 1

As the wheel rotates, it transfers a percentage of the heat and moisture differential from one airstream to the other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

As the wheel rotates, it transfers a percentage of the heat and moisture differential from one airstream to the other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoisture transfer: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS9092017B2Energy recovery ventilation effectiveness calculation and indication
Publication Date: 2015.07.28 AIR DISTRIBUTION TECHNOLOGIES IP LLC
  • US9092017B2 patent drawing
  • US9092017B2 patent drawing
  • US9092017B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates generally to air handling systems for buildings, more particularly to energy recovery ventilation systems, and specifically to a calculation/estimation of effectiveness which may be used for informational and maintenance purposes.