Escalator Step Roller Axle Height Stop for Vertical Step Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing escalators face issues with individual steps shifting vertically, posing a risk of unwanted upward or tilting movements, particularly in areas where users walk, and current solutions like hooks on the step base are considered suboptimal due to manufacturing complexity.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a height limiting device that interacts with the step roller axle to prevent upward vertical movement by using the roller axis as a force transmission means, projecting laterally beyond the roller, and incorporating an L-shaped section to define a height limit stop, allowing for a stable, slim, and cost-effective design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If hooks are cast onto the step base to prevent vertical movement, then upward displacement of steps is prevented, but manufacturing effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of vertical step movementVSAvoidmanufacturing effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the height-limiting function from the step unit itself and relocates it to the roller axle. By placing the height-limiting device on the roller axle rather than casting hooks into the step base, the solution eliminates the need for additional manufacturing steps while maintaining the prevention function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The roller axle serves as an intermediary element that transfers the height-limiting function from the step unit to the roller support structure. The height-limiting device on the axle interacts with the roller guide rail, creating a simple mechanical stop that prevents vertical movement without requiring complex manufacturing of the step unit itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If height limiting devices are added to prevent upward movement, then step stability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestep stabilityVSAvoidescalator structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The roller axle is given multiple functions: it supports the roller for horizontal movement and simultaneously carries the height-limiting device to prevent vertical movement. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate height-limiting mechanisms, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining step stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The height-limiting device is merged with the roller axle assembly rather than being a separate component. This integration reduces the number of parts and simplifies the overall structure while achieving the dual purpose of supporting horizontal movement and preventing vertical displacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Loss of substance

If the step roller axle is used as force transmission means with lateral projection, then material savings are achieved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidroller axle positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the roller axle by extending it laterally beyond the roller. This parameter change allows the axle to serve dual purposes and eliminates the need for additional materials, while the precision requirements are managed through standard mechanical tolerances in the roller guide rail interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents vertical movement of escalator steps while reducing material usage and manufacturing effort, offering structural advantages and design flexibility, particularly in existing systems.

Implementation Method 1

the respective step roller axis is implemented as a force transmission means to counteract an undesired upward vertical movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the height limiting device defines a height limit stop to prevent an upward vertical movement of the respective step unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Containment: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentEP4493504B1Escalator apparatus having a height-limiting device acting on step rollers, and use
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR INNOVATION AND OPERATIONS GMBH
  • EP4493504B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4493504B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The present invention relates to an escalator apparatus (10) comprising at least one motor-driveable escalator (11) which has a multiplicity of individual escalator step units (12) which are mounted movably relative to one another, wherein the escalator step units are movable together along a movement path by motor, wherein each escalator step unit (12) has at least one step roller (13), wherein the respective step rollers are mounted about a step roller axis (X13) and are guided by a rail or similar supporting structure (14), wherein the escalator step apparatus (10) has a height-limiting device (15). Furthermore, the present invention relates to the use of a height-limiting device (15) in such an escalator apparatus.