ESFR Sprinkler Guard Segmented Plate Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sprinkler guards obstruct the spray pattern of Early-Suppression, Fast-Response (ESFR) fire protection sprinklers, causing them to fail in meeting testing requirements set by standards such as UL 1767 and FM Approval Standard 2008.

Innovation Solution

A sprinkler guard design that minimizes obstruction by using two or more plates with projections and legs, along with swing arms and a circular ring, allowing for secure mounting without disrupting the spray pattern, specifically adapted for ESFR sprinklers with K-factors of 22.4 and 25.2 gpm/(psi)1/2.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a sprinkler guard is mounted to protect the sprinkler from physical damage, then the sprinkler is protected, but the spray pattern is obstructed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesprinkler protectionVSAvoidspray pattern obstruction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The sprinkler guard is divided into multiple discrete components including a guard body, mounting brackets, and adjustable arms that can be positioned to provide protection while minimizing interference with the spray pattern. The segmented design allows the guard to be configured around the sprinkler head rather than blocking it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sprinkler guard incorporates adjustable and movable components that allow the guard to be positioned dynamically to provide maximum protection while maintaining an unobstructed spray pattern. The guard can be adjusted to different positions and angles to optimize both protection and spray performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a traditional sprinkler guard design is used, then the sprinkler is protected from physical damage, but the guard fails to meet testing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesprinkler protectionVSAvoidtesting requirement compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The sprinkler guard design parameters are specifically optimized to meet testing requirements set by standards such as UL 1767 and FM Approval Standard 2008. The guard's dimensions, material properties, and configuration are adjusted to ensure compliance with testing criteria while maintaining protection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the sprinkler guard structure is made more complex to provide better protection, then the sprinkler is better protected, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesprinkler protectionVSAvoidguard structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sprinkler guard is divided into modular components that can be independently manufactured and assembled, reducing overall complexity while maintaining protection effectiveness. Each component has a specific function and can be optimized separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sprinkler guard design incorporates multi-functional components that provide both structural support and protection, reducing the total number of parts needed. The guard structure serves multiple purposes including physical protection, mounting support, and spray pattern maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12179225B2Sprinkler guard for a fire protection sprinkler and a method of manufacturing a sprinkler guard
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US12179225B2 patent drawing
  • US12179225B2 patent drawing
  • US12179225B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sprinkler guard, mountable to a fire protection sprinkler, includes a first plate with projections from the first plate in a first lateral direction orthogonal to a central axis, and a lower surface facing a downward direction opposite to the upward direction, a second plate with projections from the second plate in a second lateral direction opposite to the first, and a lower surface facing the downward direction, first and second legs having an upper end attached to the lower surface of the first plate, a middle portion extending in the downward direction, and a lower end, third and fourth legs having an upper end attached to the lower surface of the second plate, a middle portion extending in the downward direction, and a lower end. A circular ring is attached to the lower ends of the first to fourth legs, and the legs are spaced about the circular ring.