ESP Intake System with Sliding Sleeve for Abrasive Fluid Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electric submersible pump (ESP) intake systems are ineffective in handling high concentrations of abrasive solids, leading to clogging, reduced flow rates, and premature pump failure, especially in hydraulically fractured wells, resulting in increased costs and production delays.

Innovation Solution

An ESP intake system featuring a filtered intake section and an actuating sliding sleeve intake section that can switch between closed and open positions, allowing the filtered intake to serve as the primary intake initially and the sliding sleeve to take over when the filtered intake becomes clogged, maintaining flow rates and protecting the pump from abrasive damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional intake screen is used to block solids, then pump protection from abrasives is improved, but the intake screen quickly becomes clogged and scaled, reducing fluid flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump protectionVSAvoidfluid flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The intake system is divided into multiple independent intake sections (first intake section with filter, second intake section without filter) that can operate separately. This segmentation allows the system to switch between filtered and unfiltered intake paths, preventing complete flow blockage when one section becomes clogged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the filtration parameter dynamically by switching between different intake sections. The first intake section provides filtered flow when solids concentration is manageable, while the second intake section provides unfiltered flow when the first becomes clogged, adapting to changing well conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If backwashing systems are implemented to clean the intake screen, then clogging is reduced, but the system becomes more complex and requires complicated operating procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintake screen functionalityVSAvoidcleaning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The harmful function of the intake screen (clogging) is extracted and isolated to a specific section (first intake section). When this section becomes clogged, the system switches to the second intake section, effectively removing the clogged screen from the flow path without requiring complex cleaning mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The first intake section with its filter acts as a sacrificial element that can become clogged and be switched out, allowing the use of a simple, inexpensive filter rather than a complex, expensive backwashing system. The system accepts that this section will eventually fail and plans for its replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If a sacrificial clean out pump assembly is used in fractured wells, then pump damage from proppant is prevented, but production costs increase significantly due to frequent pump replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump protection from proppantVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtration of abrasives and solids before the fluid reaches the pump, using the first intake section with its filter. This preliminary action protects the pump from proppant and abrasives, eliminating the need for sacrificial pump assemblies and reducing replacement costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The filter in the first intake section acts as an intermediary element between the abrasive-laden well fluid and the pump. It intercepts and removes harmful solids before they can reach and damage the pump, protecting the expensive equipment without requiring frequent replacements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If the filtered intake section is used initially, then pump protection is maximized, but flow rate decreases due to filtration resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump protectionVSAvoidfluid flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between filtered and unfiltered intake modes based on operational conditions. It starts with filtered intake for pump protection, then transitions to unfiltered intake when the filter becomes clogged, optimizing the balance between protection and flow rate throughout the system's operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution extends the operational life of ESPs in abrasive environments by preventing clogging and maintaining flow rates, eliminating the need for backwash systems and sacrificial pumps, thereby reducing intervention costs and minimizing production disruptions.

Implementation Method 1

a first intake section including a filter and a first fluid entrance, wherein fluid entering the ESP intake system through the first fluid entrance passes through the filter before flowing into the ESP pump

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

The ESP assembly includes a pressurizing pump hydraulically coupled to the sleeve by a hydraulic hose, the pressurizing pump adjusting a pressure of a space above the sliding sleeve to actuate the second fluid entrance between the closed position and the open position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic actuation: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

Centrifugal pumps impart energy to a fluid by accelerating the fluid through a rotating impeller paired with a stationary diffuser, together referred to as a 'stage.'

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS10677032B1Electric submersible pump intake system, apparatus, and method
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US10677032B1 patent drawing
  • US10677032B1 patent drawing
  • US10677032B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric submersible pump (ESP) intake system, apparatus and method is described. An ESP intake system includes a filtered intake section coupled adjacently to a sliding sleeve intake section, wherein the sliding sleeve intake section has a closed initial state and is selectively actuatable to an open position when the filtered intake section becomes at least partially clogged. An ESP intake method includes operating an ESP pump downhole in a well including abrasive-laden fluid, the ESP pump including a filtered intake section and an actuatable intake section, employing the filtered intake section as a first fluid entrance into the ESP pump, monitoring information from ESP sensors during employment of the first fluid entrance to identify clogging of the filtered intake section, and opening the actuatable intake section upon the clogging so identified such that the actuatable intake section serves as a second fluid entrance into the ESP pump.