ESP Well Control System Predictive Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for ESP lifted wells struggle to optimize production and minimize power consumption while maintaining equipment within operational constraints under varying well conditions, often leading to safety shutdowns and reduced equipment lifetime.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize sensors and predictive numerical models to generate control signals for ESP and other well devices, adjusting operations to maintain optimal conditions and prevent shutdowns by coordinating available controls, such as ESP speed, production choke, and fluid injections, based on real-time measurements and future predictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing control systems operate ESP lifted wells under varying well conditions, then production continues, but equipment may exceed operational constraints leading to safety shutdowns and reduced equipment lifetime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil productionVSAvoidequipment lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary actions by predicting future well conditions using numerical models before actual changes occur. It anticipates when operational parameters will exceed constraints and takes preventive control actions to keep the ESP within safe operating limits, thereby avoiding safety shutdowns and extending equipment lifetime while maintaining production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If control systems adjust ESP operation to optimize production, then oil production increases, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoil productionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system optimizes the balance between production and power consumption by dynamically adjusting operational parameters such as ESP speed, production choke opening, and fluid injection rates. It uses predictive models to determine the optimal combination of these parameters that maximizes oil production while minimizing power consumption, considering the non-linear relationships between parameters and their effects on production and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple control devices are coordinated for optimal well operation, then production optimization improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction optimizationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system merges the control of multiple devices (ESP, production choke, fluid injection systems) into a unified predictive control framework. By integrating these controls and using a comprehensive numerical model that considers interactions between all devices, the system achieves optimal production while managing complexity through centralized coordination rather than multiple independent control loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The predictive numerical model acts as an intermediary that processes information from multiple sensors and coordinates control actions across multiple devices. It serves as a mediator that understands the complex interactions between ESP operation, choke settings, and fluid injection, translating these relationships into coordinated control signals that optimize production without requiring direct complex interconnections between all control devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If real-time measurements and predictive models are used to generate control signals, then equipment operates within safe parameters, but measurement and control requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe operationVSAvoidmeasurement and control requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system implements comprehensive feedback by continuously measuring well conditions (pressure, temperature, flow rates, equipment parameters) and using this information in predictive numerical models to generate control signals. The system monitors the effects of control actions and adjusts predictions and control signals accordingly, creating a closed-loop feedback system that ensures safe operation while managing the complexity of measurements and controls through intelligent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10125584B2Well control system
Publication Date: 2018.11.13 EQUINOR ENERGY AS
  • US10125584B2 patent drawing
  • US10125584B2 patent drawing
  • US10125584B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating an electrical submersible pump, ESP, lifted well, the method comprising: measuring a characteristic of the well or a characteristic of a device associated with the well; generating a first control signal for instructing a change in the operation of the ESP; generating a second control signal for instructing a change in the operation of a further device associated with the well; wherein a degree of change in each of the first and second control signals is dependent on the outcome of the measuring and on a known effect caused by sending at least one of said first control signal to the ESP or said second control signal to the further device associated with the well; and sending the first control signal to the ESP and the second control signal to the further device associated with the well.