Essentialized Document Generation for Technician Skill Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Technicians face inefficiencies in solving asset problems due to incomplete and complex work orders that lack essential context, often requiring manual search through large datasets and containing redundant information, which can be overwhelming especially when dealing with unfamiliar asset components.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that generates an essentialized document by determining critical factors from work orders, assessing user skills, and customizing the document to provide relevant information tailored to the technician's skill level, omitting redundant data and including explanations or references as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If complete work orders with all available data are provided to technicians, then information completeness is improved, but information overload and complexity increase making it overwhelming especially for unfamiliar asset components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidwork order complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments work order information into essential and non-essential components. The system identifies and extracts only the critical information needed to resolve the specific asset problem, separating it from redundant data. This segmentation reduces work order complexity while maintaining information completeness for the specific problem at hand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by customizing work order information based on the technician's skill level and the specific asset component involved. The system adjusts the level of detail and technical depth provided, offering more comprehensive information for unfamiliar components while providing concise information for familiar ones, thereby optimizing information delivery without overwhelming the technician.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If all available work order data is presented to technicians, then context coverage is improved, but time to process and understand the information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext coverageVSAvoidinformation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing and analyzing work order data before presentation to the technician. The system automatically identifies critical factors, extracts essential information, and organizes it in a prioritized manner before the technician receives it. This preliminary processing reduces the time required for the technician to understand and act on the information while maintaining comprehensive context coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential and relevant information from the complete work order data set. The system identifies and removes redundant information, presenting only the critical context needed to resolve the asset problem. This extraction process maintains full context coverage for problem-solving while significantly reducing the time required for information processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If work orders include detailed information for all asset components, then problem-solving accuracy is improved, but redundancy increases overwhelming the technician

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem-solving accuracyVSAvoidinformation redundancy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by providing detailed information only for the specific asset components relevant to the current problem, rather than including exhaustive details for all components. The system identifies which components are critical to resolving the issue and provides comprehensive information for those while omitting or summarizing information for unrelated components, thereby maintaining problem-solving accuracy without information redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of operation

If work orders are standardized for all technicians, then ease of use is improved, but adaptability to different skill levels decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework order usabilityVSAvoidskill-level adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making work order information adaptive rather than static. The system dynamically adjusts the content, detail level, and presentation of work orders based on the technician's skill level, experience, and the specific asset component involved. This dynamic adaptation maintains ease of use through consistent formatting while providing customized information depth and technical complexity appropriate to each technician's capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240394292A1Assembling of essentialized documents based on task set analysis and subject skill scoring
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240394292A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394292A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394292A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more systems, devices, computer program products and/or computer-implemented methods provided herein facilitate generation of an essentialized document that aids a technician in solving a problem with an asset. In an embodiment, the essentialized document is customizable based on technician skill. In another embodiment, the essentialized document is customizable based on the asset and asset components at issue.