eSVC Risk Evaluation System for Fraud Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic stored-value cards (eSVCs) are susceptible to fraud, theft, and unauthorized access due to a lack of sufficient safeguards in the eSVC industry, particularly during transactions such as displaying, funding, or authorizing eSVCs.

Innovation Solution

A risk evaluation system that assesses requests for eSVC services by determining parameters such as email validation, device fingerprinting, proxy type identification, and geographical location to calculate a risk score, thereby deciding whether to provide the service, with SMS or additional validation required based on the score.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If eSVC services are provided without sufficient safeguards, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to fraud and unauthorized access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk evaluation by analyzing multiple parameters (device information, location, transaction patterns) before providing eSVC services. This advance assessment establishes security measures proactively, preventing fraud while maintaining operational smoothness for legitimate users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors transaction data and user behavior, using this feedback to dynamically adjust risk scores and security measures. This creates a self-improving security mechanism that adapts to emerging threats while maintaining ease of operation for verified users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If risk evaluation parameters are extensively analyzed, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The risk evaluation system is divided into modular components that independently assess different parameters (device information, geographic location, transaction patterns). Each module processes specific data types and contributes to the overall risk score, making the complex system manageable and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The risk evaluation platform serves multiple functions: fraud detection, user authentication, transaction monitoring, and security policy enforcement. This multi-functional design consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single unified platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10692087B2Electronic financial service risk evaluation
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 BLACKHAWK NETWORK INC
  • US10692087B2 patent drawing
  • US10692087B2 patent drawing
  • US10692087B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Electronic stored value cards (“eSVCs”) may be susceptible to fraud, theft, or unauthorized access. As eSVCs are still relatively new, the eSVC industry may not have fully developed sufficient safeguards to prevent such fraud, therft, and unauthorized access. Disclosed herein are systems, apparatus, and methods for evaluating whether or not to provide a service, which may include displaying, funding, or authorizing an eSVC. The evaluation may be in response to a request for such a service. The evaluation may be based on a risk due to fraud, theft, or unathorized access.