Worksite Operation Time Estimation With ETC and Live ETR Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managers of worksite operations, particularly in agricultural settings, face challenges in efficiently planning, scheduling, and distributing mobile work machines to complete operations within critical time windows due to factors like weather, machine breakdowns, and operator issues, necessitating accurate estimation of operation completion times and remaining times.

Innovation Solution

A system and method to generate estimated time to complete (ETC) and estimated time remaining (ETR) for worksite operations, accounting for historical performance, crop type, and machine variability, using machine learning models and sensor data to provide precise time estimates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If historical rate of work metrics and machine learning models are used to estimate time to complete, then measurement precision of time estimation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime estimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A remote server is introduced as an intermediary component that hosts the machine learning model and processes time estimation calculations. This mediator handles the computational complexity centrally, allowing client devices to query for estimates without running complex models locally, thus improving measurement precision while managing device complexity through centralized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual or simple mechanical time estimation methods with automated machine learning models that process multiple input parameters (area, crop type, number of machines, historical data) to generate accurate time estimates. This substitution of mechanical/simpler systems with intelligent automated systems resolves the contradiction by achieving high precision through computational intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If multiple input parameters and machine learning models are used for time estimation, then measurement precision is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime estimation accuracyVSAvoiddata collection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically collects and processes required parameters such as worksite area, crop type, and number of machines without requiring manual measurement or intervention. The machine learning model self-processes these inputs to generate time estimates, reducing the operational difficulty of detecting and measuring parameters while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If real-time monitoring and weight metrics are applied during operation, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation efficiencyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system monitors actual operation progress and compares it against estimated time parameters. Weight metrics and live estimates provide continuous feedback to adjust productivity calculations and provide accurate remaining time estimates, improving operational efficiency through adaptive feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Time estimation calculations are performed in advance using historical data and machine learning models before operations begin. This preliminary action establishes baseline expectations and allocation metrics that guide real-time monitoring, allowing the system to track productivity against pre-calculated benchmarks without requiring complex real-time analysis during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12524714B2Systems and methods for time estimation for machine operations
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 DEERE & CO
  • US12524714B2 patent drawing
  • US12524714B2 patent drawing
  • US12524714B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprises identifying an area of worksite at which an operation is to be performed, identifying a historical rate of work metric, obtaining a model, identifying a number of work machines that are to perform the operation, identifying a crop type corresponding to the operation to be performed, identifying an ETC metric based on the area of the worksite, the historical rate of work metric, the number of work machines, the crop type, and the model. The method further comprises identifying, once the operation is initiated, a first weight metric, a second weight metric, a live estimate metric indicative of a first time until the work will be completed in the operation, and identifying an ETR metric, indicative of a second time until the work will be completed in the operation, based on the first weight metric, the ETC metric, the second weight metric, and the live estimate metric.