Electronic Throttle Control Rack and Pinion Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic throttle control (ETC) systems face challenges in packaging size, cost, complexity, and longevity, particularly in vehicles where operator controls are integrated with the throttle mechanism, requiring a compact, cost-effective, and reliable solution that provides precise control and user feedback.

Innovation Solution

The ETC assembly incorporates a rack and pinion gear mechanism with compression springs that provide a safe return force and adjustable haptic feedback, allowing for a compact design that integrates auxiliary controls and electronics, reducing component count and simplifying the supply chain, while enabling customizable resistive forces and reduced wear compared to cam interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a traditional ETC packaging is used, then the system is simple to manufacture, but the package size is large and aesthetics are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage sizeVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the ETC assembly with auxiliary vehicle controls into a single integrated housing structure. The operator controls are positioned on the housing of the ETC packaging, merging multiple functions into one compact unit that reduces overall package size while maintaining manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The housing structure serves multiple functions: it encloses the ETC sensor assembly, provides mounting for auxiliary operator controls, and acts as the structural interface with the handle bar. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components and packaging elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If more operator controls are added near the throttle, then control accessibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accessibilityVSAvoidcomponent quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple operator controls are integrated into the single ETC housing structure, allowing higher quantity of controls to be reachable by the operator while their hand is on the throttle control. This merging approach provides versatile control accessibility without proportionally increasing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The housing structure is designed to accommodate multiple types of operator controls (buttons, switches, dials) in addition to the throttle mechanism itself, creating a universal control hub that maximizes functionality within a single integrated unit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a rack and pinion gear with compression springs is used, then haptic feedback and reliability are improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe return forceVSAvoidgear interface precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Compression springs are incorporated into the rack and pinion gear mechanism to provide beforehand cushioning and controlled resistance during throttle operation. The springs are positioned to engage with the gear teeth, providing smooth haptic feedback and ensuring a safe return force to the closed throttle position, thereby improving reliability while managing precision requirements through elastic compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables a more compact, cost-effective, and aesthetically pleasing ETC system with improved user feedback and reduced wear, allowing for a higher quantity of accessible controls and easier customization, while maintaining reliability and precision in throttle control.

Implementation Method 1

compression springs that provide a safe return force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

compression springs that provide a safe return force and adjustable haptic feedback

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 3

rack and pinion gear mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear mechanism: Gear

Implementation Method 4

rack and pinion gear mechanism with compression springs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS10864962B2Electronic throttle control assembly
Publication Date: 2020.12.15 SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US10864962B2 patent drawing
  • US10864962B2 patent drawing
  • US10864962B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic throttle control assembly for a vehicle has a housing that mounts to a handlebar of the vehicle and defines an interior. A rack gear is mounted in the interior for movement in a linear, translational, and/or radial direction. A pinion gear within the interior moves the rack gear upon rotation of the pinion gear. A sensor target is coupled to the rack gear. A sensor detects a position of the sensor target and generates an electric signal for a vehicle control unit. A grip is coupled to the pinion gear, rotation of the grip moving the rack gear and sensor target in a linear, translational, and/or radial direction, the electric signal varying based on the change in position of the sensor target. Opposing springs within the housing resist movement of the rack gear and rest in a normally preloaded state.