Etch Chamber Conditioning With Carbon Coating for Clean III-V Etching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The etching of type III-V semiconductor materials, such as GaN and GaAs, often results in surface damage like roughened surfaces and structural defects due to plasma etching, which can lead to electrical traps and inconsistent etch quality.

Innovation Solution

An in-situ process is employed to form a thin, carbon-based protective polymer layer within the etching tool's interior surfaces using gases like C2H4, which minimizes contamination and ensures consistent etching conditions by absorbing oxygen and protecting the chamber surfaces, allowing for precise etching of semiconductor wafers without the need for additional dummy wafer processing steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If plasma etching is used to etch type III-V semiconductor materials, then etching capability is achieved, but surface damage and contamination increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching capabilityVSAvoidsurface damage and contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A protective polymer layer is deposited on the chamber walls before the etching process begins. This preliminary action prevents direct contact between the plasma and chamber surfaces, reducing surface damage and contamination during the etching of type III-V semiconductor materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A carbon-containing protective polymer layer acts as an intermediary between the plasma and the chamber walls. This layer absorbs harmful plasma effects and prevents direct damage to the chamber surfaces while allowing the etching process to proceed effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If protective polymer layer is formed before each etching cycle, then surface damage is reduced, but process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface damageVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of forming a thick protective layer, a thin polymer layer is deposited that provides sufficient protection against surface damage. This partial action approach reduces the deposition time while still achieving the desired protection effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The deposition parameters are optimized to form a thin but effective protective layer. By adjusting gas flow rates, power settings, and deposition time, the process achieves adequate surface protection with minimal time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If carbon containing gas is introduced to form protective layer, then contamination is reduced, but chamber cleanliness after process deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecontaminationVSAvoidchamber contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The carbon-containing protective layer is intentionally designed to be temporary and removable. After serving its protective function, the layer is discarded through standard cleaning processes, and the chamber is recovered to a clean state for the next production cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The protective polymer layer acts as a disposable protective barrier. It is formed, used for protection during etching, and then removed. This short-living protective layer provides effective contamination prevention during the process while allowing easy chamber cleanup afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces surface damage and contamination, maintaining consistent etch quality across multiple cycles by forming a new protective layer before each etching process, thereby enhancing the fabrication of high-electron-mobility semiconductor devices.

Implementation Method 1

a first process gas is introduced into the interior chamber, the first process gas forming the carbon containing protective material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Implementation Method 2

absorbing oxygen and protecting the chamber surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP3422391B1Method of conditioning an etch chamber for contaminant free etching of a semiconductor device
Publication Date: 2024.04.03 INFINEON TECH AUSTRIA AG
  • EP3422391B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3422391B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3422391B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An etching tool that includes an interior chamber is provided. A plurality of type III-V semiconductor wafers is provided. A process cycle is performed for each one of the type III-V semiconductor wafers in the plurality. The process cycle includes performing a preliminary contamination control process. The process cycle further includes inserting one of the type III-V semiconductor wafers into the interior chamber. The process cycle further includes etching type III-V semiconductor material away from the type III-V semiconductor wafer that is present in the interior chamber. The process cycle further includes removing the type III-V semiconductor wafer that is present in the interior chamber. The preliminary contamination control process includes forming a carbon containing protective material that completely covers exposed surfaces of the interior chamber.