Etch Profile Simulation via Plasma Physics Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lithographic projection systems face challenges in accurately simulating etch profiles due to simplistic geometric models that fail to account for local pattern features and global effects, leading to poor correlation between simulated and actual overlay measurements.

Innovation Solution

A semi-empirical model is introduced that uses multiple parameters to represent plasma physics and material behavior, capturing local etch loading effects and global non-uniformities, and is calibrated using SEM images to reconstruct post-etch profiles, enabling more accurate simulation of etch profiles for improved overlay determination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a simplistic geometric model is used for etch profile simulation, then the model complexity is low and ease of manufacture is improved, but the manufacturing precision and reliability of overlay predictions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of simulationVSAvoidaccuracy of etch profile prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the etch profile simulation from a simple geometric model to a physics-based model by changing the parameters from basic geometric dimensions to plasma physics parameters including reaction rates, transport coefficients, and material behavior characteristics. This allows the simulation to capture complex etch phenomena while maintaining computational feasibility through parameterized modeling approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a calibration layer as an intermediary between the physical etch process and the simulation model. By calibrating the physics-based model against experimental SEM images and measured etch profiles, the model bridges the gap between theoretical plasma physics and actual manufacturing outcomes, significantly improving prediction accuracy without requiring complete first-principles understanding of all etch phenomena.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If a simplistic geometric model is used for etch profile simulation, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of overlay measurements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of simulation modelVSAvoidreliability of overlay prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the simulation model from simple geometric descriptions to comprehensive plasma physics parameters. This includes incorporating reaction kinetics, plasma transport, and material-specific etch behavior parameters that directly influence overlay accuracy, thereby improving reliability while managing complexity through systematic parameter organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where simulated etch profiles are compared against actual measured profiles from SEM images and overlay measurements. This feedback loop allows for continuous refinement and calibration of the physics-based model parameters, ensuring that the simulation reliably predicts actual etch behavior and overlay outcomes while adapting to process variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If a semi-empirical model with multiple parameters is used, then the accuracy of etch profile prediction is improved, but the device complexity and difficulty of calibration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of etch profile predictionVSAvoidcomplexity of model parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically organizes multiple physics-based parameters into categorized groups (plasma generation, transport, reaction, and material parameters) with clear physical meanings and units. This structured parameter approach enables accurate etch profile prediction while making the complex model more manageable through hierarchical parameter organization and physical interpretability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calibration of the semi-empirical model using reference SEM images and known etch conditions before actual production use. By pre-calibrating the multiple parameters against validated experimental data, the model reduces the complexity of real-time adjustments and enables accurate predictions without requiring complex optimization during manufacturing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230144584A1Method for determining an etch profile of a layer of a wafer for a simulation system
Publication Date: 2023.05.11 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US20230144584A1 patent drawing
  • US20230144584A1 patent drawing
  • US20230144584A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining an etch profile is described. The method includes determining a masking layer profile. Loading information can be determined. The loading information indicates dependence of an etch rate for the masking layer profile on a quantity and pattern of material being etched. Flux information can be determined. The flux information indicates dependence of the etch rate on an intensity and a spread angle of radiation incident on the masking layer profile. Re-deposition information can be determined. The re-deposition information indicates dependence of the etch rate on an amount of material removed from the masking layer profile that is re-deposited back on the masking layer profile. An output etch profile for the layer of the wafer is determined based on the loading information, the flux information, and/or the re-deposition information.