Etch Profile Simulation via Plasma Physics Parameters
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current lithographic projection systems face challenges in accurately simulating etch profiles due to simplistic geometric models that fail to account for local pattern features and global effects, leading to poor correlation between simulated and actual overlay measurements.
Innovation Solution
A semi-empirical model is introduced that uses multiple parameters to represent plasma physics and material behavior, capturing local etch loading effects and global non-uniformities, and is calibrated using SEM images to reconstruct post-etch profiles, enabling more accurate simulation of etch profiles for improved overlay determination.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of manufacture
If a simplistic geometric model is used for etch profile simulation, then the model complexity is low and ease of manufacture is improved, but the manufacturing precision and reliability of overlay predictions deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent transforms the etch profile simulation from a simple geometric model to a physics-based model by changing the parameters from basic geometric dimensions to plasma physics parameters including reaction rates, transport coefficients, and material behavior characteristics. This allows the simulation to capture complex etch phenomena while maintaining computational feasibility through parameterized modeling approaches.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a calibration layer as an intermediary between the physical etch process and the simulation model. By calibrating the physics-based model against experimental SEM images and measured etch profiles, the model bridges the gap between theoretical plasma physics and actual manufacturing outcomes, significantly improving prediction accuracy without requiring complete first-principles understanding of all etch phenomena.
2Device complexity
If a simplistic geometric model is used for etch profile simulation, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of overlay measurements deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the simulation model from simple geometric descriptions to comprehensive plasma physics parameters. This includes incorporating reaction kinetics, plasma transport, and material-specific etch behavior parameters that directly influence overlay accuracy, thereby improving reliability while managing complexity through systematic parameter organization.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements a feedback mechanism where simulated etch profiles are compared against actual measured profiles from SEM images and overlay measurements. This feedback loop allows for continuous refinement and calibration of the physics-based model parameters, ensuring that the simulation reliably predicts actual etch behavior and overlay outcomes while adapting to process variations.
3Manufacturing precision
If a semi-empirical model with multiple parameters is used, then the accuracy of etch profile prediction is improved, but the device complexity and difficulty of calibration increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent systematically organizes multiple physics-based parameters into categorized groups (plasma generation, transport, reaction, and material parameters) with clear physical meanings and units. This structured parameter approach enables accurate etch profile prediction while making the complex model more manageable through hierarchical parameter organization and physical interpretability.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent performs preliminary calibration of the semi-empirical model using reference SEM images and known etch conditions before actual production use. By pre-calibrating the multiple parameters against validated experimental data, the model reduces the complexity of real-time adjustments and enables accurate predictions without requiring complex optimization during manufacturing operations.
Data Source
AI summary
A method for determining an etch profile is described. The method includes determining a masking layer profile. Loading information can be determined. The loading information indicates dependence of an etch rate for the masking layer profile on a quantity and pattern of material being etched. Flux information can be determined. The flux information indicates dependence of the etch rate on an intensity and a spread angle of radiation incident on the masking layer profile. Re-deposition information can be determined. The re-deposition information indicates dependence of the etch rate on an amount of material removed from the masking layer profile that is re-deposited back on the masking layer profile. An output etch profile for the layer of the wafer is determined based on the loading information, the flux information, and/or the re-deposition information.


