Two-Zone Ethane ODH Process for Unconverted Oxygen Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ethane oxidative dehydrogenation processes face challenges in managing unconverted oxygen in the effluent, which poses explosion hazards and requires cumbersome additional steps for carbon monoxide and acetylene removal, coupled with the production of carbon dioxide, leading to inefficiencies and high capital expenditure.

Innovation Solution

A two-zone oxidative dehydrogenation process using mixed metal oxide catalysts, where ethane and oxygen are supplied to a first zone, and the effluent is mixed to uniformly distribute unconverted oxygen before being fed to a second zone for further conversion, decoupling the removal of unconverted oxygen from carbon monoxide and acetylene.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If more oxygen is fed to the ODH reactor to avoid oxygen depletion conditions, then the risk of operating at oxygen depletion conditions is reduced, but unconverted oxygen in the effluent increases the risk of explosion hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveavoid oxygen depletion conditionsVSAvoidexplosion hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes unconverted oxygen from the ODH effluent through a dedicated oxygen removal step before the back-end separation section. This eliminates the harmful effect of unconverted oxygen while allowing the reactor to operate with excess oxygen to avoid depletion conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a separate oxygen removal step is added to remove unconverted oxygen, then explosion hazards are reduced, but the process complexity and capital expenditure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosion hazardsVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the oxygen removal function with the existing back-end separation section by integrating it as a preprocessing step. The oxygen removal unit operation is merged into the overall separation train, allowing shared infrastructure and reducing the need for completely separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The oxygen removal step is designed to serve multiple purposes: removing unconverted oxygen to prevent explosion hazards, preparing the effluent for subsequent separation operations, and potentially removing other contaminants. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by providing multiple benefits from a single unit operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If unconverted oxygen is removed before the back-end separation section, then explosion hazards are reduced, but additional energy demand is incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexplosion hazardsVSAvoidenergy demand
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The oxygen removal step is performed preliminarily, before the back-end separation section, to eliminate unconverted oxygen early in the process. This preliminary action prevents downstream explosion hazards and may reduce the energy demand of subsequent separation operations by simplifying the composition of the effluent entering the separation section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach eliminates the need for separate oxygen removal steps, optimizes reaction conditions, reduces energy demand, and enhances catalyst stability, while minimizing capital expenditure and improving ethylene yield.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the ethane and oxygen with the catalyst in the multiple reactor tubes in the first oxidative dehydrogenation zone resulting in multiple effluent streams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

the multiple reactor tubes are cooled by a coolant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

mixing at least a portion of the multiple effluent streams from step b) resulting in a mixture comprising ethylene, unconverted ethane and unconverted oxygen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing: Turbulence

Implementation Method 4

contacting at least a portion of the mixture from step c) with the catalyst in the second oxidative dehydrogenation zone resulting in a stream comprising ethylene and unconverted ethane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS12540109B2Ethane oxidative dehydrogenation process
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 SHELL USA INC

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for the production of ethylene by oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) of ethane, comprising: a) supplying ethane and oxygen to a first ODH zone which is formed by multiple reactor tubes containing a mixed metal oxide ODH catalyst bed; b) contacting the ethane and oxygen with the catalyst resulting in multiple effluent streams, wherein the multiple reactor tubes are cooled by a coolant; c) mixing at least a portion of the multiple effluent streams from step b) resulting in a mixture comprising ethylene, unconverted ethane and unconverted oxygen; d) supplying at least a portion of the mixture from step c) to a second ODH zone containing a mixed metal oxide ODH catalyst bed; e) contacting at least a portion of the mixture from step c) with the catalyst in the second ODH zone resulting in a stream comprising ethylene and unconverted ethane.