Ethanol Dehydration Heat Exchanger Simplification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity and high costs associated with multi-reactor systems for ethanol dehydration due to the need for numerous heat exchangers and complicated piping arrangements, especially when the number of reaction zones is large, make maintenance and operation economically unviable.

Innovation Solution

The use of a single heat exchanger to reheat multiple effluent-streams from adiabatic reactor zones simplifies the system by reducing the number of heat exchangers and piping complexity, allowing for efficient ethanol dehydration to ethene production with fewer pressure vessels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple heat exchangers are used to reheat effluent-streams from each reactor zone, then the temperature control and dehydration efficiency are improved, but the system complexity and piping arrangement become excessively complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveethanol dehydration efficiencyVSAvoidpiping arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate heat exchangers into a single integrated heat exchanger that processes effluent-streams from multiple reactor zones simultaneously. This merging approach maintains the temperature control functionality needed for efficient ethanol dehydration while dramatically simplifying the piping arrangement and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single heat exchanger is designed to perform multiple functions by reheating effluent-streams from different reactor zones within the same device. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate heat exchangers for each zone, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining dehydration efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple pressure vessels are used for separate reactors, then the process continuity and maintenance flexibility are improved, but the footprint and apparatus complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance flexibilityVSAvoidapparatus footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate pressure vessels into a single integrated reactor system with internally separated reaction zones. This consolidation reduces the overall apparatus footprint while maintaining the ability to perform maintenance on individual zones without shutting down the entire system, thus preserving maintenance flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor system employs a nested structure where multiple reaction zones are contained within a single pressure vessel. Each zone can be independently accessed and maintained, similar to nested dolls, allowing for maintenance flexibility while occupying a smaller overall footprint compared to separate vessels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Temperature

If numerous heat exchangers are deployed for multiple reaction zones, then the temperature optimization for each zone is improved, but the manufacturing cost and installation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvezone temperature optimizationVSAvoidsystem installation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple heat exchanger units into a single integrated heat exchange system that serves multiple reaction zones. This approach maintains the capability for temperature optimization in each zone while significantly reducing manufacturing complexity, installation difficulty, and overall system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces system complexity and costs, enhances maintenance accessibility, and maintains the efficacy of ethanol dehydration processes even with multiple reaction zones, making large-scale systems more economically viable.

Implementation Method 1

the effluent-streams are re-heated by a heat exchanger prior to being fed into a subsequent reaction zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

The reaction is highly endothermic and as such requires high temperatures to achieve efficient conversion of ethanol to ethene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic reaction: Endothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentEP3233766B1Process and apparatus for ethanol dehydration
Publication Date: 2023.08.02 TECHNIP E&C LTD
  • EP3233766B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3233766B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3233766B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention provides a process for the preparation of ethene by vapour phase chemical dehydration of ethanol using an adiabatic reactor, wherein the interior of the adiabatic reactor is separated into at least three reaction zones, comprising a first reaction zone, at least one intermediate reaction zone and a final reaction zone, and wherein each zone contains an ethanol dehydration catalyst; said process comprising the steps of; a) feeding a pre-heated reactant feed-stream into an inlet of the first reaction zone; b) extracting an effluent-stream from an outlet of the first reaction zone; c) feeding said effluent-stream into an inlet of a subsequent intermediate reaction zone; d) extracting an effluent-stream from an outlet of the intermediate reaction zone; e) repeating steps (c) and (d) for any subsequent intermediate reaction zones, if present; f) feeding, into an inlet of the final reaction zone, the effluent-stream from the preceding intermediate reaction zone; g) extracting a product stream from an outlet of the final reaction zone; wherein the effluent-streams are re-heated prior to being fed into a subsequent reaction zone by means of one or more heat exchangers and; and wherein a single heat exchanger simultaneously re-heats at least two of the effluent-streams, such that no more than one heat exchanger is present for every two effluent-streams being re-heated in the process.