Ethanol Production via Methyl Acetate Hydrogenation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing ethanol from methanol are inefficient and do not effectively utilize syngas-derived carbon monoxide and hydrogen to achieve high yields of ethanol.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the reaction of methanol and carbon monoxide to produce methyl acetate, followed by hydrogenolysis and hydrogenation in the presence of a catalyst, such as a salt of an active metal or finely divided active metal with a dimethyl carbonate promoter, to convert the methyl acetate into ethanol, utilizing syngas for all or part of the required methanol, hydrogen, and CO.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current methods for producing ethanol from methanol are used, then the process is simple, but the yield and efficiency are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveethanol yieldVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process segments the ethanol production into distinct stages: carbonylation of methanol to produce methyl acetate and acetic acid, followed by hydrogenolysis and hydrogenation steps. This segmentation allows optimization of each stage independently, improving overall ethanol yield while managing complexity through structured process design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Methyl acetate and acetic acid serve as intermediary compounds in the transformation from methanol to ethanol. The use of these intermediates enables indirect conversion pathways that achieve higher ethanol yields compared to direct conversion methods, while the intermediaries can be managed through standardized chemical processing units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If syngas-derived carbon monoxide and hydrogen are utilized, then renewable biomass is used reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but the production efficiency is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidgreenhouse gas emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The process optimizes reaction parameters including temperature (150-250°C for carbonylation, 200-300°C for hydrogenolysis), pressure (30-100 atm), and catalyst composition to maximize ethanol yield from syngas-derived feedstocks. These parameter optimizations ensure high production efficiency while maintaining the environmental benefit of using renewable biomass-derived syngas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The process converts carbon monoxide, which can be a harmful byproduct or waste stream, into valuable ethanol through catalytic carbonylation and hydrogenolysis reactions. By utilizing syngas-derived CO and H2, the process transforms potential emissions into useful fuel products, eliminating greenhouse gas harm while maintaining high production efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Quantity of substance

If methanol and carbon monoxide are reacted to produce methyl acetate, then ethanol can be produced through hydrogenolysis, but the process requires multiple steps increasing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveethanol quantityVSAvoidnumber of reaction steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The process merges the carbonylation reaction (producing both methyl acetate and acetic acid) with subsequent hydrogenolysis and hydrogenation steps into an integrated production pathway. This merging allows the multi-step process to be managed as a unified system, achieving high ethanol quantities while controlling overall process complexity through integrated design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process achieves a high yield of ethanol by optimizing the molar ratio of methanol to carbon monoxide and using syngas-derived reactants, enhancing the production efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions by utilizing renewable biomass.

Implementation Method 1

The reaction of methanol and carbon monoxide is a carbonylation reaction, which creates a carbon-carbon (C-C) bond, and which may be effected in the presence of a catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

The methyl acetate then is hydrogenolyzed and hydrogenated using hydrogen (such as, for example, hydrogen which has been separated from syngas) to produce ethanol

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenolysis:

Implementation Method 3

hydrogenating (i) said methyl acetate produced in step (a), and (ii) said at least one acetate produced by reacting said acetic acid with said at least one alcohol, to produce ethanol

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentEP2244993B1Production of ethanol from methanol
Publication Date: 2016.04.27 ENERKEM INC

AI summary

A process for converting methanol to ethanol which comprises reacting methanol and carbon monoxide in the presence of a catalyst to produce a product comprising at least 25 mole% methyl acetate and, in some instances, acetic acid. The acetic acid then is reacted with at least one alcohol to produce at least one acetate selected from methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, and butyl acetate. The at least one acetate (if produced) and the methyl acetate produced as a result of reacting methanol and carbon monoxide then are hydrogenated to produce ethanol. Syngas may be produced from biomass to produce all or a portion of the methanol, hydrogen, and carbon monoxide requirements for the process.