Ethernet Power Management for Full Device Shutdown Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for managing electrical power supply via Ethernet cables do not effectively reduce energy consumption and electromagnetic emissions by completely powering off devices when they are not needed.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for managing electrical power to Ethernet devices via Ethernet cables, utilizing a management system with a memory that maps devices to identifiers, allowing for automatic power interruption or restoration based on input information from user devices or electronic calendars, ensuring complete power cutoff when not needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Ethernet devices are kept in standby mode to maintain readiness, then device availability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice availabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic monitoring of device status and usage patterns, switching devices between active and powered-off states based on detected activity. This periodic action allows devices to be fully powered off during non-use periods while quickly restoring service when needed, resolving the contradiction between availability and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of device usage patterns and predicts when devices will be needed, pre-maintaining them in active state only when necessary. This preliminary action optimizes the balance between device availability and energy consumption by avoiding unnecessary standby power usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Use of energy by moving object

If Ethernet devices are completely powered off to reduce energy consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but device responsiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoiddevice responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor device usage patterns, user presence, and service requirements in real-time. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of power states, ensuring devices are powered off only when truly unnecessary, thus maintaining energy efficiency without sacrificing responsiveness when devices are actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts device power states based on real-time conditions rather than using static standby modes. Devices transition between fully active and completely powered-off states based on detected needs, optimizing both energy efficiency and responsiveness through dynamic adaptation to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If manual power management is used to control Ethernet devices, then operational control is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables Ethernet devices to self-manage their power states based on detected usage patterns, user presence, and service requirements. Devices automatically transition between active and powered-off states without manual intervention, simplifying operation while reducing the need for complex manual control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple functions (device monitoring, usage pattern analysis, power state control, and communication) into an integrated power management platform. This merging reduces overall system complexity by consolidating control functions rather than requiring separate manual control mechanisms for each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If Ethernet cables continuously supply power to all devices, then device availability is improved, but energy waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice availabilityVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the power supply control at the individual device level rather than providing continuous power through Ethernet cables to all devices. Each device's power state is independently controlled based on its specific needs, allowing selective power delivery that eliminates energy waste while maintaining availability where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the power delivery parameter from continuous fixed power through Ethernet cables to dynamic variable power states. Power is delivered only when and where needed, with the ability to completely interrupt power supply to specific devices, thereby eliminating energy waste while maintaining device availability on demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260058835A1Management of electrical power supply via ethernet cable
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 ECOGREEN SOFT SPRL
  • US20260058835A1 patent drawing
  • US20260058835A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a method for managing the supply of electrical power to Ethernet devices. The Ethernet devices are connected to a management system via an Ethernet cable supplying them with current. When input information is received by the management system, the management system determines, on the basis of a first list of the Ethernet devices, whether it has to interrupt the supply of power to one or more of the Ethernet devices or, conversely, to re-establish the supply of power thereto.