Ethylene Oxide Catalyst Selectivity via Temperature Inversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wisdom suggests that lower temperatures improve catalyst selectivity in ethylene epoxidation processes, but this is not necessarily true, especially for modern high-selectivity catalysts operating under low CO2 levels, where the optimal feed composition is often considered sub-optimal, and adjusting feed components to minimize temperature does not always result in maximum selectivity.

Innovation Solution

Operating the catalyst under constrained conditions, initially at a temperature below 240°C, then adjusting the ethylene, oxygen, and carbon dioxide concentrations to achieve an operating temperature between 240 and 255°C, while maintaining the desired work rate, to achieve higher selectivity, and compensating for catalyst activity decline by adjusting feed components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the catalyst operating temperature is reduced below 240°C to improve selectivity according to conventional wisdom, then the selectivity initially improves, but the selectivity actually decreases and the optimal selectivity cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveselectivityVSAvoidcatalyst operating temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating temperature parameter from the conventional low-temperature range (below 240°C) to a higher range (240-255°C) to achieve optimal selectivity. This counterintuitive parameter change resolves the contradiction by demonstrating that for modern high-selectivity catalysts with low CO2 levels, higher temperatures within this specific range actually maximize selectivity rather than reduce it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the feed composition is adjusted to minimize catalyst temperature (higher ethylene, higher oxygen, lower CO2), then the temperature decreases, but the selectivity does not reach maximum for modern high-selectivity catalysts

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveselectivityVSAvoidcatalyst operating temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by operating at higher temperatures (240-255°C) rather than lower temperatures to achieve maximum selectivity. This inversion principle resolves the contradiction by showing that for modern high-selectivity catalysts, the traditional relationship between temperature and selectivity is reversed within this specific temperature range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Manufacturing precision

If the catalyst is operated at higher temperatures to achieve optimal selectivity (240-255°C), then the selectivity improves, but the catalyst activity deteriorates faster over time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveselectivityVSAvoidcatalyst activity duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where catalyst activity is continuously monitored and feed composition is dynamically adjusted to maintain optimal operating temperature (240-255°C) and compensating for catalyst deactivation. This feedback loop resolves the contradiction by allowing operation at the optimal higher temperature while compensating for activity loss through real-time feed adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly exceeds the maximum selectivity attainable at lower temperatures by manipulating feed components to increase the catalyst temperature, leading to improved ethylene oxide production and maintaining selectivity as the catalyst activity deteriorates over time.

Implementation Method 1

an olefin is reacted with oxygen to form an olefin epoxide, using a catalyst comprising a silver component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

An example of such highly selective catalysts is a catalyst comprising silver and a rhenium promoter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPromotion:

Data Source

PatentEP2714670B2Process for improving the selectivity of an EO catalyst
Publication Date: 2022.03.02 SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV
  • EP2714670B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2714670B2 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A process for improving the selectivity of an EO process utilizes a highly selective EO catalyst. An improvement in the initial operation of a process for manufacturing ethylene oxide comprises contacting ethylene, oxygen, a chloride moderator and a hydrocarbon co- moderator with a high selectivity silver-containing catalyst at a concentration of carbon dioxide of less than about 2 mole percent, wherein the initial operating temperature is determined by optimization of such initial operating temperature at a level higher than the normal low initial operating temperature that is typically selected to obtain a longer operating cycle.