ETL Code Validation for Shared Infrastructure Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-standardized code authored for ETL processes on shared computing infrastructure can destabilize the infrastructure, cause downtime, and compromise security, due to potential vulnerabilities and resource exploitation.

Innovation Solution

Implement a feature authoring library with a compliance system that validates the initialization and execution of ETL processes against defined standards, ensuring code compliance and stability across different platforms and infrastructures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If non-standardized code is allowed for ETL processes, then adaptability and ease of authoring are improved, but system stability and security deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode adaptabilityVSAvoidinfrastructure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance system performs preliminary validation of ETL code against defined standards before the code is executed on the shared infrastructure. This advance checking prevents non-compliant code from destabilizing the system, thereby maintaining reliability while allowing adaptability in code authoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The compliance system acts as an intermediary between code authors and the shared computing infrastructure. It validates code against standards and either approves or rejects it before execution, mediating between the need for code flexibility and the need for system stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive code validation is implemented, then system security and stability are improved, but processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem securityVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process is segmented into distinct phases: initialization validation and execution validation. Each phase checks specific aspects of code compliance against defined standards, making the overall complex validation process more manageable and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-affected harmful factors

If code compliance validation is performed, then infrastructure security is improved, but execution time is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfrastructure securityVSAvoidexecution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Compliance validation is performed preliminarily, before code execution on the shared infrastructure. This prevents security violations from occurring during execution, avoiding the need for time-consuming remediation and ensuring faster overall processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260064711A1Validating code for an extract, transform, and load process
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20260064711A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064711A1 patent drawing
  • US20260064711A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a device may receive a request to validate code defining a feature for compliance with a feature authoring library. The code may configure one or more phases of an extract, transform, and load (ETL) process associated with obtaining data for the feature. The device may identify one or more standards for assessing whether an initialization or an execution of the one or more phases of the ETL process is indicative of the code complying with the feature authoring library. The device may determine whether the initialization or the execution of the one or more phases of the ETL process satisfies the one or more standards. The device may transmit, based on whether the initialization or the execution of the one or more phases of the ETL process satisfies the one or more standards, a response indicating whether the code complies with the feature authoring library.