eToken Fingerprint Binding for Secure PKI Host Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems are vulnerable to attacks where attackers exploit PKI client stations using eTokens installed on other hosts, compromising security.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for binding eTokens to specific client devices using unique fingerprint data, regenerating device fingerprints, and verifying matches or acceptable differences to ensure secure data transmission only occurs on authorized devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If eTokens are made portable and usable across different hosts, then ease of operation is improved, but security is worsened due to vulnerability to attacks where attackers exploit PKI client stations using eTokens from other hosts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveportability of eTokenVSAvoidsecurity of PKI client station
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary binding between the eToken and the host by generating and storing fingerprint data from host parameters before actual use. This pre-established binding relationship prevents the eToken from being used on unauthorized hosts, resolving the security vulnerability while maintaining portability within authorized contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces fingerprint data as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between the eToken and the host system. This fingerprint acts as a unique identifier and binding agent, allowing the system to verify whether the eToken is being used on its authorized host without compromising either portability or security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If eTokens are bound to specific client devices using fingerprint data, then security is improved by preventing unauthorized use, but device complexity is worsened due to additional verification mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity binding of eTokenVSAvoidcomplexity of verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates fingerprint data automatically from existing host parameters without requiring external intervention or complex setup procedures. The binding process is self-executing, using readily available system information to create the security binding, thereby minimizing the increase in device complexity while maintaining strong security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If fingerprint verification is performed for every eToken operation, then security is improved, but productivity is worsened due to additional verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity verification accuracyVSAvoidspeed of secure data access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The fingerprint binding is established once during initialization, and subsequent operations leverage this pre-established binding. The system does not perform complete verification for every operation but rather checks against the pre-stored fingerprint data, significantly reducing the overhead per operation while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12483410B2Token node locking with fingerprints authenticated by digital certificates
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
  • US12483410B2 patent drawing
  • US12483410B2 patent drawing
  • US12483410B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for receiving secure data in a client device. In one embodiment, the method comprises (a) receiving a token having a token ID and a digital certificate generated by a certificate authority (CA) having client device fingerprint data generated from client device parameters, (b) accepting a request in the client device to provide secure data to the client device, (c) regenerating the client device fingerprint data from the client device parameters, (d) determining, in the client device, differences between the client device fingerprint data of the digital certificate from the regenerated client device fingerprint data, and (e) transmitting a request to a secure data service to provide secure data based upon the determination.