eUSB2 Repeater Idle Detection Without CDR or PLL

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The implementation of Embedded USB (eUSB2) repeaters faces challenges in communicating with legacy USB systems due to voltage level differences, leading to noise issues from idle signals and the need for large clock data recovery (CDR) or phase locked loop (PLL) components that increase cost and power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A circuit that interfaces between eUSB2 and USB systems, using comparators and logic components to detect idle signals and maintain the last bit of the End of Packet (EOP) indicator for up to four additional bits, preventing noise transmission without requiring CDR or PLL circuits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If CDR or PLL circuits are used to handle voltage level differences and detect idle signals, then communication reliability between eUSB2 and legacy USB systems is improved, but device size and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential function of idle signal detection from complex CDR/PLL circuits by using a simple comparator that monitors the differential voltage between signal lines. This extraction allows the system to achieve reliable idle detection without incorporating the full complexity of CDR or PLL circuits, thereby reducing device size while maintaining communication reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, complex CDR/PLL circuits with a simple, low-cost comparator circuit. The comparator is a basic electronic component that provides the necessary idle detection functionality without the overhead of complex clock recovery mechanisms, effectively using a simpler, cheaper component to achieve the required function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If CDR or PLL circuits are used to handle voltage level differences and detect idle signals, then communication reliability between eUSB2 and legacy USB systems is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential function of idle signal detection from power-intensive CDR/PLL circuits by using a simple comparator that monitors the differential voltage between signal lines. This extraction allows the system to achieve reliable idle detection without incorporating the full complexity of CDR or PLL circuits, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining communication reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, power-consuming CDR/PLL circuits with a simple, low-power comparator circuit. The comparator is a basic electronic component that provides the necessary idle detection functionality without the overhead of complex clock recovery mechanisms, effectively using a simpler, lower-power component to achieve the required function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Use of energy by moving object

If the transmitter is turned off immediately after EOP indicator transmission, then power consumption is reduced, but noise from idle signals is transmitted to legacy USB systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidnoise transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by detecting the idle signal condition before the transmitter is turned off. The comparator continuously monitors the differential voltage and detects when the signal lines transition to an idle state. This early detection allows the system to maintain the transmitter in an off state for a brief period after EOP transmission without generating noise, as the idle condition is already detected and accounted for.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback by continuously monitoring the differential voltage between signal lines with a comparator and using this information to control the transmitter state. The comparator provides real-time feedback about the signal condition, allowing the system to adjust transmitter operation to prevent noise transmission while minimizing power consumption. The feedback mechanism ensures that the transmitter remains off during idle periods when noise generation would be problematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively prevents noise transmission while complying with USB specifications, reducing size and power consumption, and enabling efficient communication between eUSB2 and legacy USB systems.

Implementation Method 1

a comparator configured to detect when the differential input signal lines go idle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVoltage comparison:

Implementation Method 2

logic components configured to extend the EOP indicator for up to four additional bits following the detected idle transition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal holding:

Data Source

PatentEP3830706B1Embedded universal serial bus 2 repeater
Publication Date: 2023.06.28 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • EP3830706B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5
  • EP3830706B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3830706B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure provide for a method (500). In some examples, the method includes receiving, at a circuit, data via a differential input signal (505). The method further includes detecting a falling edge in the data received via the differential input signal (515). The method further includes holding an output of the circuit at a final logical value of the data (520). The method further includes disabling a transmitter of the circuit while holding the output of the circuit at the final logical value of the data (525). The method further includes releasing the output of the circuit from the final logical value of the data (525).