EUV Lithography Mask Absorber Thickness and Refractive Index

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Extreme ultraviolet lithography faces challenges due to mask 3D effects, which result in contrast fading, feature-dependent best focus shifts, and telecentricity errors, leading to reduced pattern accuracy and increased defectivity during chip manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

The use of an extreme ultraviolet lithography mask with a patterned absorber layer of specific thickness (15 nm to 35 nm) and refractive index (at most 0.93), combined with a multipolar extreme ultraviolet radiation source and a setup adapted for compensating image shifts, to mitigate mask 3D effects and improve lithography processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a conventional absorber layer thickness is used in the mask, then the mask structure is simpler, but mask 3D effects cause contrast fading and reduced pattern accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern accuracyVSAvoidmask structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the absorber layer thickness to be within 15-35 nm and selecting materials with specific refractive indices (n < 0.93). These parameter optimizations reduce mask 3D effects and improve pattern accuracy without fundamentally changing the mask structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material strategies by combining the absorber layer with a multi-layer reflector structure. The specific material selection (absorber layer material with n < 0.93 combined with reflector materials) creates a composite optical system that minimizes 3D effects while maintaining functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If the absorber layer thickness is reduced to minimize 3D effects, then pattern accuracy improves, but the reflectivity decreases and more radiation dose is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern accuracyVSAvoidradiation dose
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the absorber layer thickness parameter to the specific range of 15-35 nm, which balances the competing requirements: thin enough to minimize 3D effects and improve pattern accuracy, but thick enough to maintain adequate reflectivity and reduce required radiation dose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by selecting absorber materials with specific optical properties (refractive index n < 0.93) at the absorber layer interface. This localized material optimization enhances the optical performance at the critical interface between absorber and reflector, improving reflectivity without increasing thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If a multipolar extreme ultraviolet source is used, then pattern placement errors are reduced, but mask 3D effects cause pole-to-pole phase offsets and image shifts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern placement accuracyVSAvoidimage shift
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the absorber layer optical parameters (thickness and refractive index) to minimize the differential interaction with multipolar radiation sources. By tuning these parameters, the mask reduces pole-to-pole phase offsets and image shifts while maintaining the benefits of multipolar illumination for pattern placement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the contrast and reduces defectivity in extreme ultraviolet lithography, allowing for a larger process window and reduced stochastic failures, thereby enabling the push of lithography steps to lower k1 imaging processes.

Implementation Method 1

a multi-layer reflector, and a patterned absorber layer positioned over the multi-layer reflector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

a patterned absorber layer positioned over the multi-layer reflector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption (EM radiation): Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS20250155791A1Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography Mask
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO ELECTRONICS CENT (IMEC VZW)
  • US20250155791A1 patent drawing
  • US20250155791A1 patent drawing
  • US20250155791A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An extreme ultraviolet lithography mask includes a multi-layer reflector and a patterned absorber layer positioned over the multi-layer reflector. The patterned absorber layer has a thickness between 15 nm and 35 nm and a refractive index of at most 0.93. In some examples, the patterned absorber layer has a thickness between 15 nm and 30 nm.