EUV Mask Blank Substrate Flatness Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing substrates for EUV lithography mask blanks fail to achieve sufficient flatness, particularly in reducing the short-wavelength component of surface shapes, which limits the effectiveness of wavefront correction and affects exposure accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A method involving local processing and finish polishing steps to set a predetermined calculation region on the substrate surfaces, where the shape is evaluated and smoothed using a Gaussian filter to achieve flatness of 100 nm or less, with a difference of 20 nm or less between the highest and lowest values, and further refined to reduce short-wavelength components using a hard polishing cloth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If double-sided simultaneous polishing is used for manufacturing glass substrates, then manufacturing efficiency is improved, but sufficient flatness for EUVL cannot be obtained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidflatness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the polishing process into two distinct stages: double-sided simultaneous polishing for initial flatness and local processing for final precision. This segmentation allows each stage to optimize for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between efficiency and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The double-sided simultaneous polishing is performed as a preliminary action to achieve baseline flatness before the local processing step. This preliminary action removes large-scale irregularities efficiently, setting the stage for the subsequent precision work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If local processing technique is used to correct flatness by removing convex regions, then flatness is improved, but short-wavelength surface components remain that limit wavefront correction effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflatnessVSAvoidwavefront correction effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical local processing with a new approach that includes finish polishing with specific polishing cloths. This substitution reduces short-wavelength surface components that mechanical processing cannot eliminate, thereby improving wavefront correction effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the polishing parameters by using specific polishing cloth types and adjusting polishing conditions to target and reduce short-wavelength surface components. This parameter change allows the process to achieve both flatness and surface smoothness required for effective wavefront correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional polishing methods are used, then manufacturing process is simple, but flatness reaches a plateau and cannot be further improved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidflatness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a continuous multi-stage polishing process where each stage builds upon the previous one. The process continues through double-sided polishing, local processing, and finish polishing with hard and soft cloths, ensuring continuous improvement of flatness without reaching a plateau.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of manufacture

If short-wavelength surface components are not reduced, then manufacturing process remains simple, but wavefront correction function becomes less effective for future miniaturization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to future EUVL requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs finish polishing with hard and soft polishing cloths as a preliminary action to reduce short-wavelength surface components before the substrate is used for EUVL applications. This preliminary action ensures the substrate is pre-optimized for future wavefront correction requirements and miniaturization needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies multiple polishing steps with different cloth types to cushion against future performance limitations. By reducing short-wavelength components in advance, the substrate is prepared to withstand the demands of future EUVL miniaturization and wavefront correction technologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of substrates with highly flat surfaces that can be accurately wavefront-corrected, enhancing exposure mask performance and achieving better transfer accuracy in EUV lithography.

Implementation Method 1

a local processing step and a finish polishing step subsequent to the local processing step

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS20230418149A1Substrate for mask blanks and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2023.12.28 SHIN ETSU CHEMICAL CO LTD

AI summary

A substrate for mask blanks having first and second main surfaces of 152 mm×152 mm square and a thickness of 6.35 mm, wherein: when a range of 132 mm×132 mm square centered on an intersection of diagonal lines is defined as a calculation region in each of the first and second main surfaces, on a substrate surface of the calculation region of at least one of the first and second main surfaces, flatness of the substrate surface of the calculation region based on a least square plane is 100 nm or less, and a difference (PV) between a highest value and a lowest value of a height of a calculation surface represented by a difference between shapes of the substrate surfaces before and after smoothing processing with a Gaussian filter (10 mm×10 mm) based on the least square plane is 20 nm or less.