EUV Optical Element Degradation Prediction and Decontamination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optical elements in EUV lithography projection exposure apparatuses face degradation due to chemical reactions with residual gases, leading to reduced reflectivity and operational issues, which existing methods fail to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the determination of degradation profiles, prediction of future degradation, and targeted feeding of decontamination media, such as hydrogen or oxygen, to maintain optical element performance by monitoring deviations from pre-defined limit values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If the optical element is operated in a vacuum environment with residual gas atmosphere, then the EUV radiation can reach the optical element, but chemical reactions occur between the reflective coating layers and residual gases leading to degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEUV radiation transmissionVSAvoidreflective coating stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by creating a multilayer reflective coating system consisting of alternating high-refractive-index layers (e.g., molybdenum, ruthenium) and low-refractive-index layers (e.g., silicon, silicon oxide). This composite structure optimizes EUV reflectivity while the outermost layer provides chemical stability against residual gas reactions, thus resolving the contradiction between radiation transmission and coating stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements an inert environment strategy by maintaining ultra-high vacuum conditions in the projection exposure apparatus and using an inert gas atmosphere (e.g., nitrogen or rare gases) in the storage and transport environment. This prevents chemical reactions between the reflective coating and reactive residual gases, thereby protecting the coating stability while allowing EUV operation when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

2Reliability

If a capping layer is applied to protect against degradation, then the reflective coating is protected, but the capping layer itself is subject to degradation such as oxidation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereflective coating protectionVSAvoidcapping layer lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by designing a multilayer capping structure where the outermost layer consists of highly oxidation-resistant materials such as platinum, palladium, or iridium. These materials form a stable protective barrier that prevents oxidation of inner layers while maintaining long-term stability in the vacuum environment, thus extending the capping layer lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the disposable principle by designing the capping layer as a sacrificial protective element that can be easily replaced. The capping layer is intentionally made as a separate, replaceable component that protects the expensive multilayer reflective coating during operation and can be renewed when degradation occurs, extending the overall system lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If degradation monitoring is performed continuously, then future degradation can be predicted, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegradation prediction accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring optical parameters (reflectivity, transmission) of the optical element and using this information to predict future degradation states. The monitoring system provides real-time feedback to the control unit, which adjusts operational parameters or triggers maintenance alerts when degradation thresholds are approached, enabling predictive maintenance without excessive system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical monitoring systems with optical measurement methods. Instead of physical inspection or contact-based sensing, the system uses non-contact optical measurements of reflectivity and transmission to monitor degradation, significantly reducing system complexity while maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for early identification and mitigation of critical degradation states, ensuring reliable and efficient operation of optical elements by regulating their degradation and extending their lifespan.

Implementation Method 1

the chemical reaction is initiated or at least fostered by the EUV radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

such a capping layer may also be subject to a degradation, for example an oxidation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

feeding of a first decontamination medium (in particular a reducing medium) into the interior

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS12140877B2Method for avoiding a degradation of an optical element, projection system, illumination system and projection exposure apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • US12140877B2 patent drawing
  • US12140877B2 patent drawing
  • US12140877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for avoiding a degradation of an optical element, wherein the optical element is arranged in a housing, comprising: a) determining a first degradation value; b) determining a second degradation value, wherein the first degradation value and the second degradation value are determined at different times; c) forming a degradation profile based on the first degradation value and the second degradation value; d) calculating a temporal development of the degradation profile; e) determining at least one predicted degradation value based on the calculated temporal development of the degradation profile; f) comparing the at least one predicted degradation value with a predefinable first limit degradation value; g) monitoring for a predefinable first deviation between the at least one predicted degradation value and the first limit degradation value; h) feeding a first decontamination medium into the interior if attainment of the predefinable first deviation is identified.