Structural EV Battery Cell Matrix for Crash-Safe Pack Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery electric vehicles face challenges in maximizing volumetric efficiency, weight reduction, and crash safety while integrating battery packs as a structural part of the vehicle body, with current designs often requiring multiple components and gaps that compromise space efficiency and increase vehicle size.

Innovation Solution

A battery frame structure with accommodating cavities holds battery cells in place using a flowable bonding substance, forming a rigid and integral brick that reduces the need for fasteners and allows for a compact, impact-resistant battery pack that can be easily integrated into the vehicle frame.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional standalone battery pack design with safety cage and gaps is used, then crash safety and cell protection are improved, but volumetric efficiency deteriorates and vehicle size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash safetyVSAvoidvolumetric efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the battery pack structure with the vehicle body structure by integrating the battery casing to form the bottom of the vehicle body and removing the traditional front floor. This integration eliminates the need for separate safety cages and gaps, achieving both crash safety and improved volumetric efficiency simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The battery pack structure serves multiple functions: it acts as the vehicle body bottom, provides crash safety protection, and eliminates the need for separate floor structures. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by making the same structure serve both safety and space-efficient purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Stability of the object's composition

If multiple fastener members (end plates, bolt fixations, tension straps) are used to secure battery cells, then cell positioning stability is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell positioning stabilityVSAvoidnumber of fastener members
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the need for multiple fastener members (end plates, bolt fixations, tension straps) by using a resin bonding substance that directly secures battery cells to the battery pack structure. This reduction in components decreases device complexity and weight while maintaining cell positioning stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical fastening system (multiple fastener members) with a chemical bonding system (resin bonding substance). This substitution simplifies the structure by eliminating complex mechanical assemblies while providing stable cell positioning through adhesive bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Quantity of substance

If larger footprint is used to compensate for lower volumetric efficiency, then cell volume capacity is improved, but vehicle size and stopping distance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell volume capacityVSAvoidvehicle size
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the battery pack with the vehicle body structure and eliminating gaps and tolerances, the patent achieves higher volumetric efficiency. This allows more cell volume to be packed into the same footprint, increasing capacity without increasing vehicle size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the spatial arrangement parameters by eliminating gaps and reducing tolerance spaces between components. This parameter optimization allows maximum cell density within the available volume, achieving high capacity without increasing external dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances volumetric efficiency, reduces weight by 200 kg, and improves crash safety by distributing impact forces, while maintaining structural integrity and thermal management, thus optimizing the battery pack's integration into the vehicle.

Implementation Method 1

each battery cell being placed in a respective accommodating cavity and connected to adjacent walls of the respective accommodating cavity via a flowable bonding substance being inserted between the cells and the walls of the respective cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesive bonding: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS12597667B2Structural battery for an electric vehicle comprising a battery cell support matrix
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 VOLVO CAR CORP
  • US12597667B2 patent drawing
  • US12597667B2 patent drawing
  • US12597667B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electric vehicle including a battery assembly with at least two rows of battery cells attached to a battery frame structure. The battery frame structure has a number of accommodating cavities, arranged in a matrix, each battery cell being placed in a respective accommodating cavity and connected to adjacent walls of the respective accommodating cavity via a flowable bonding substance being inserted in a gap between the cells and the walls of the respective cavity.