EV Battery Charging Scheduling for Grid Load Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The demand for peak power from utility grids to support plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) leads to inefficiencies and increased costs due to the need for fast-response power plants, while off-peak hours see underutilization of more efficient, slower-response plants, resulting in higher energy costs for users and utilities.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that determines the optimal time to recharge electric vehicle batteries from the utility grid during periods of lower demand, communicating with the utility to synchronize charging with off-peak hours and complete recharging by the desired time, thereby optimizing grid usage and reducing energy costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If charging is performed during peak hours to ensure battery is ready when needed, then battery availability is improved, but grid load and energy cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery availabilityVSAvoidenergy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary charging during off-peak hours before the battery is needed, rather than charging during peak hours. The controller determines the time required to recharge and schedules charging to complete by a desired time, utilizing lower-cost off-peak power to reduce energy costs while ensuring battery availability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If fast-response power plants are used to meet peak demand, then grid reliability is improved, but operational efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid reliabilityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system schedules battery charging during off-peak hours when slow-response, high-efficiency power plants are operating. This preliminary charging action reduces the need for fast-response power plants during peak hours, allowing them to be idled or operated at lower capacity, thereby improving their operational efficiency while maintaining grid reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If charging is delayed to off-peak hours to reduce energy cost, then energy cost is reduced, but battery readiness time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy costVSAvoidcharging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts charging parameters based on real-time conditions. The controller monitors the time required to recharge the battery and the current grid conditions, then schedules charging to complete by a desired time. This dynamic scheduling allows the system to utilize off-peak hours for charging while ensuring the battery is ready when needed, balancing cost reduction with time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7679336B2Interactive battery charger for electric vehicle
Publication Date: 2010.03.16 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US7679336B2 patent drawing
  • US7679336B2 patent drawing
  • US7679336B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for recharging an electric storage battery in the charging system of an electric vehicle from an electric utility power grid includes determining the length of time required to recharge the battery, determining the desired time when the recharge is to be completed, transmitting to the electric power utility the length of time required to recharge the battery and the desired time, and recharging the battery from the utility grid during a period when projected load demand is lower than peak demand and ending no later than the desired time.