Structural EV Battery Pack Using Cell Compression as Chassis Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current battery packs in electric vehicles have low volumetric efficiency and require redundant structures, leading to increased weight, reduced range, and compromised crashworthiness due to sub-optimal integration with the vehicle body-in-white structure.

Innovation Solution

A battery pack design that integrates rectangular battery cells between longitudinal sill members and transverse beams, applying a compressive force of 20-200 kN/m2, forming a structural component that replaces traditional vehicle floor structures, with optional compression members and air gaps for impact absorption, allowing for improved volumetric efficiency and reduced weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If traditional standalone battery pack design is used, then protective cage and separate mechanical structures are provided, but volumetric efficiency is low and vehicle weight is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolumetric efficiencyVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The battery pack is merged with the vehicle body structure by integrating the protective cage with the chassis frame. The battery pack serves dual functions as both energy storage unit and structural component, eliminating redundant separate mechanical structures and improving volumetric efficiency while reducing overall vehicle weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The battery pack is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: energy storage, protective cage function, and structural chassis component. This multi-functionality allows the same component to provide both operational and structural benefits, reducing the need for additional separate structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If battery pack is designed as standalone unit with separate mechanical structures, then protective function is provided, but device complexity and redundant structures increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective functionVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective cage and battery pack are merged into a single integrated unit that forms part of the vehicle chassis. This combination maintains the protective function while eliminating the need for separate mechanical structures, thereby reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated battery pack structure serves multiple purposes: it provides protective enclosure for the cells, acts as a structural chassis component, and integrates with the vehicle frame. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed while maintaining protective reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If larger cell footprint is used to compensate for low volumetric efficiency, then energy capacity is maintained, but vehicle dimensions and stopping distance are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy capacityVSAvoidvehicle dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The battery cells are arranged in a three-dimensional configuration within the integrated pack structure, utilizing vertical stacking and multi-level arrangements. This dimensional optimization allows high energy capacity to be achieved within a compact footprint, avoiding increases in vehicle length or width

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Strength

If more structures are added to battery pack, then structural strength is improved, but weight and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidpack weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The battery pack structure is merged with the vehicle chassis, allowing the same components to provide both battery support and vehicle structural strength. This eliminates redundant structures and reduces overall weight while maintaining or improving structural performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The battery pack components are designed to serve dual purposes: supporting the battery cells and providing structural reinforcement to the vehicle. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate structural elements, thereby reducing weight while maintaining strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The integrated design enhances vehicle responsiveness, reduces weight, increases stopping distance, and improves crashworthiness by leveraging the battery pack as a structural element, while maintaining efficient energy absorption and thermal management.

Implementation Method 1

the front piece and the transverse member exerting a compressive force of between 20 and 200 kN/m2 on the cells in the length direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS12415411B2Structural battery for an electric vehicle and method of manufacturing
Publication Date: 2025.09.16 VOLVO CAR CORP
  • US12415411B2 patent drawing
  • US12415411B2 patent drawing
  • US12415411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery pack for use in an electric vehicle, includes two longitudinal sill members extending in a length direction L, interconnected at a front side by a transverse front piece and at a distance from the front piece by a transverse member. Two or more rows of battery cells are placed side by side between the sill members. The front piece and the transverse member exert a compressive force of between 20 and 200 kN/m2 on the cells in the length direction.