EV Battery Cooling Control for Fast Charging Temperature Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge is to balance maximizing the electric vehicle (EV) battery charge current during direct current fast charging (DCFC) while maintaining battery temperature and gradient temperature below derate thresholds, thereby ensuring battery longevity and performance.

Innovation Solution

A battery cooling model is employed to determine the specific amount of cooling needed for the EV battery during DCFC, ensuring that both battery temperature and gradient temperature remain below their respective derate thresholds by adjusting the charging current and providing targeted cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If high-power direct current fast charging is used to maximize charge current, then charge time is reduced, but battery temperature and gradient temperature exceed derate thresholds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge timeVSAvoidbattery temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is activated before the battery temperature reaches the derate threshold during DCFC. The controller predicts temperature rise based on charge current and activates cooling in advance, allowing the battery to charge at maximum current without exceeding temperature limits, thus reducing charge time while maintaining temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A coolant system acts as an intermediary between the battery and the environment to manage heat transfer. The coolant absorbs heat from the battery during DCFC, enabling high charge currents to be sustained without temperature excursions that would trigger derating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If cooling is applied to maintain battery temperature below thresholds, then battery health is maintained, but charge duration increases due to reduced charge current

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery healthVSAvoidcharge duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system operates dynamically with variable coolant flow rate and temperature setpoints that adjust based on real-time battery temperature, charge current, and state of charge. This dynamic control allows maximum charge current to be maintained while only applying the necessary cooling to stay below derate thresholds, minimizing charge duration while protecting battery health.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller continuously monitors battery temperature and charge current, using feedback to adjust cooling system operation. This closed-loop control ensures the battery remains below temperature thresholds without unnecessarily reducing charge current, optimizing both battery health and charge speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Temperature

If cooling is applied early in the charge process, then temperature control is maintained, but charge time increases due to reduced charge current

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery temperature controlVSAvoidcharge time
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is activated selectively at specific points during the charge process based on predicted temperature rise, rather than continuously from the start. This allows the battery to charge at maximum current during early stages when temperature rise is minimal, activating cooling only when necessary to prevent threshold exceedance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for efficient DCFC at maximum charge current without exceeding temperature thresholds, thereby minimizing charge time while maintaining battery health and performance.

Implementation Method 1

heat can be produced within the battery. This heat, unless dissipated, can impact the longevity and performance of the battery

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS12325324B1Direct current fast charging cooling control
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 RIVIAN HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12325324B1 patent drawing
  • US12325324B1 patent drawing
  • US12325324B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technical solutions provide a model-based cooling control of an EV battery during a direct current fast charging (DCFC) event. The technical solutions can include a processor coupled with memory to identify a state of charge (SOC), a temperature threshold and a gradient threshold for a difference in temperature between at least two cells of an EV battery. The processor can determine an amount of cooling to apply during a charge of the battery based at least on the SOC, the temperature of the battery and the difference in temperature input into a model for cooling the battery to maintain the temperature below the temperature threshold and the difference in temperature below the gradient threshold. The processor can provide to the battery the amount of cooling determined by the model to maintain the temperature below the temperature threshold and the difference in temperature below the gradient threshold during the charge.