EV Charger De-Energizing Protocol for Disruption Shutdown
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing electric vehicle charging systems lack effective safety measures to prevent unauthorized charging, unauthorized vehicles from stealing electrical energy, and potential hazards due to disruptive connections, which can lead to system disruptions and resource wastage.
Innovation Solution
A system and method for emergency shutdown of an electric charger using a de-energizing protocol, involving a computing device that detects disruptions through sensors and initiates an immediate shutdown to prevent unauthorized charging and protect the charging system from potential hazards.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional charging systems operate without emergency shutdown protocols, then charging accessibility and ease of operation are maintained, but system safety and security are compromised due to unauthorized charging and disruptive connections
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary verification of authorization and connection integrity before allowing charging to proceed. Sensors continuously monitor connection status and authorization tokens are validated in advance, preventing unauthorized charging before it can occur.
Solution Approach 2:
A computing device acts as an intermediary between the charging infrastructure and electric vehicles, mediating authentication, monitoring connection status through sensors, and controlling the charging process. This intermediary layer enforces safety protocols while maintaining ease of use for authorized users.
2Reliability
If sensors and computing devices are added to detect disruptions and initiate shutdowns, then system security and protection against unauthorized use are improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The computing device performs multiple functions: authentication verification, sensor data processing, disruption detection, and charging control. This multi-functionality consolidates security operations into a single device, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive security.
Solution Approach 2:
The system automatically detects disruptions through sensors and initiates shutdown protocols without human intervention. The computing device self-manages security operations by processing sensor data and executing emergency shutdowns autonomously, reducing the need for additional manual monitoring systems.
3Loss of energy
If emergency shutdown protocols are implemented to prevent unauthorized charging, then energy theft and resource wastage are prevented, but charging time and productivity may be affected
Solution Approach 1:
Sensors provide continuous feedback on connection status and authorization state throughout the charging process. The computing device monitors this feedback in real-time and only initiates shutdowns when actual disruptions or unauthorized access are detected, preventing false interruptions to legitimate charging operations.
Solution Approach 2:
The system maintains continuous monitoring and authentication verification during the entire charging process without interrupting the power flow. By performing security checks in parallel with charging operations and only shutting down when necessary, the system protects against energy theft while minimizing impact on charging productivity.
Data Source
AI summary
A system for emergency shutdown of an electric charger using a de-energizing protocol is presented. The system includes a computing device, wherein the computing device is configured to receive a sensor datum from a sensor, determine a disruption element between a charging connector and an electric vehicle as a function of the sensor datum, and initiate a de-energizing protocol as a function of the disruption element.


