On-Board EV Charger Harmonic Shaping for Fast Battery Charging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric vehicle charging systems are inefficient and can damage batteries due to high current fast charging, which limits charging speed and reduces battery life.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for shaping the charge signal based on harmonic analysis to minimize impedance and optimize charging efficiency, using a charge signal shaping circuit that adjusts the charge signal received from a charging station to correspond with harmonics associated with lower battery impedance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high current fast charging is used, then charging speed is improved, but battery damage increases and battery life decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidbattery life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic pulsed charging instead of continuous high current charging. The system delivers charging current in controlled pulses with specific duty cycles and frequencies, allowing the battery to recover between pulses while maintaining high average charging power. This periodic action enables fast charging without the continuous stress that damages battery life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts charging parameters including current magnitude, pulse width, duty cycle, and frequency based on real-time battery state monitoring. The system continuously adapts the charging waveform to match optimal impedance characteristics at different charge levels, enabling high-speed charging while preventing damage through real-time parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If high current fast charging is used, then charging time is reduced, but energy loss and heat generation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging timeVSAvoidenergy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The pulsed charging waveform creates periodic intervals where current flows and where it rests. During the off-periods, the battery's internal impedance decreases and thermal management improves, reducing energy loss. The periodic nature allows the system to maintain high average power transfer while minimizing peak energy losses that occur in continuous charging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary characterization of battery impedance across different frequencies and charge states before and during charging. This preliminary knowledge allows the controller to pre-select optimal pulse parameters that minimize energy loss for the current battery state, preventing excessive heat generation and energy waste before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If conventional charging signals are used, then charging process is simple, but charging efficiency is limited by battery impedance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging process complexityVSAvoidcharging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the parameter space of charging signals by introducing frequency and duty cycle as controllable variables in addition to current magnitude. By sweeping through different frequencies to identify optimal impedance matching points and adjusting duty cycles to control average power, the system achieves superior charging efficiency while maintaining manageable complexity through systematic parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors battery voltage, current, and temperature, and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the pulse width modulation (PWM) parameters of the charging signal. The feedback loop identifies the frequency and duty cycle that maximize charging efficiency at each moment, allowing the system to adapt to changing battery conditions while maintaining high efficiency throughout the charging process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables faster, more efficient charging while reducing battery damage and extending battery life by optimizing charge rates and minimizing energy loss.

Implementation Method 1

A system and method for shaping the charge signal based on harmonic analysis to minimize impedance and optimize charging efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHarmonic analysis:

Data Source

PatentUS12296705B2Systems and methods for on-board EV charger and regenerative braking
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 IONTRA INC
  • US12296705B2 patent drawing
  • US12296705B2 patent drawing
  • US12296705B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, circuits, and methods are disclosed herein for charging (recharging) one or more batteries of an electric vehicle through an on-board charge shaping (or tuning) circuit. The charge shaping circuit may alter the charge signal received from a charging station and/or a regenerative charge signal from the vehicle motor based on one or more charge conditions at the battery. The charge shaping circuit and/or a motor controller/inverter of the electric vehicle may include circuitry that is controllable to generate a shaped power signal in a similar manner as above, with or without the charge shaping circuit discussed above. In some implementations, one or more heat transfer systems may be included to transfer heat generated from the battery charging system to the battery.