EV Charger Controller Reactive Current Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current charging systems for plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles have a fixed charging strategy that is inefficient, requiring long charging times and high power consumption, and do not optimize energy delivery to minimize peak power draw from the grid.

Innovation Solution

A control strategy that includes a rechargeable battery system with a controller capable of determining and providing reactive current to the voltage source, allowing for modes such as constant current, constant voltage, and constant power charging, ensuring that only real power is drawn from the source, thereby optimizing energy delivery and reducing waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a fixed charging strategy is used, then the charging system is simple to operate, but the charging time is long and power consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging operation simplicityVSAvoidcharging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The charging system dynamically adjusts charging parameters (current, voltage, power) based on real-time grid conditions and battery state, transitioning between constant current, constant voltage, and constant power modes. This dynamic control optimizes charging speed while adapting to varying grid availability, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and charging time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operating parameters (charging current, voltage, power level) based on grid conditions and battery charge state. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system achieves faster charging times without requiring complex user intervention, maintaining ease of operation while improving charging efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a fixed charging strategy is used, then the charging system has low complexity, but the power consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging system complexityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes power consumption by dynamically changing charging parameters based on battery state of charge and grid conditions. It transitions between constant current, constant voltage, and constant power modes to minimize energy waste, achieving efficient power utilization without excessive system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The charging system uses feedback from battery state monitoring and grid condition detection to adjust charging parameters in real-time. This closed-loop control ensures optimal power consumption by preventing overcharging and adjusting charge rates based on actual battery needs, reducing energy waste while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If reactive current is not managed, then the charging system is simpler, but the current drawn from the voltage source contains both real and reactive components causing inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent management complexityVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and separates the reactive current component from the total current drawn from the voltage source. By identifying and managing only the real power component for charging while compensating for reactive current, the system reduces energy waste without requiring overly complex current management infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the voltage source and the battery, managing the separation of real and reactive current components. It coordinates the charging process to ensure only real power is consumed for battery charging while reactive current is compensated, reducing energy loss while maintaining reasonable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8878495B2Systems and methods for providing power to a load based upon a control strategy
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US8878495B2 patent drawing
  • US8878495B2 patent drawing
  • US8878495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for an electrical system. The electrical system, for example, includes a first load, an interface configured to receive a voltage from a voltage source, and a controller configured to receive the voltage through the interface and to provide a voltage and current to the first load. The controller may be further configured to, receive information on a second load electrically connected to the voltage source, determine an amount of reactive current to return to the voltage source such that a current drawn by the electrical system and the second load from the voltage source is substantially real, and provide the determined reactive current to the voltage source.