EV Charging Optimization via Multi-Source Data Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electric vehicles have a limited driving range due to the relatively low energy density of electric energy storage systems compared to hydrocarbon fuels, necessitating efficient and cost-effective charging solutions to enhance user convenience and reduce energy costs.

Innovation Solution

A system that optimizes electric vehicle charging by combining data on historical driving patterns, user schedules, charging station locations, and time-varying energy costs to suggest the best time and location for charging, allowing for automatic charge management and user alerts to ensure timely and economical recharging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If electric vehicles use on-board storage systems for energy, then emission reduction and noise reduction are achieved, but driving range is limited compared to fuel-powered vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemission and noiseVSAvoiddriving range
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple charging factors (time-varying energy costs, user schedules, driving patterns, charging station locations) into a unified charging optimization system that determines optimal charging times and locations, effectively extending the practical driving range by strategic energy replenishment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of user schedules, driving patterns, and energy cost variations to proactively determine optimal charging times before the vehicle needs energy, allowing users to charge during low-cost periods and avoid range limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-generated harmful factors

If frequent charging is performed to maintain electric propulsion mode, then emission reduction is achieved, but user convenience decreases due to frequent recharging stops

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveemissionVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The charging optimization system operates autonomously by automatically analyzing driving patterns, energy costs, and charging station availability to determine optimal charging times, eliminating the need for users to manually monitor charge levels and make frequent charging decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors charging effectiveness, energy cost variations, and driving pattern changes, using this feedback to refine charging recommendations and minimize the number of charging stops required while maintaining emission reduction benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Length of moving object

If charging is performed during peak energy cost periods to ensure adequate range, then driving range is maintained, but energy costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving rangeVSAvoidenergy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts charging timing based on time-varying energy cost parameters, shifting charging operations from high-cost peak periods to low-cost off-peak periods while ensuring adequate range is maintained through strategic charging at optimal times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculation of energy requirements based on predicted driving patterns and schedules, enabling charging to be performed in advance during low-cost periods rather than waiting until range becomes critical and expensive charging is required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If manual charging management is used, then system complexity is minimized, but charging optimization and cost reduction are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidenergy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The charging optimization system performs autonomous analysis of multiple factors including time-varying energy costs, user schedules, and driving patterns without requiring complex user intervention, automatically generating and executing optimized charging strategies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system integrates multiple functions (driving pattern recognition, schedule analysis, energy cost optimization, charging station location matching) into a single unified charging management platform that provides comprehensive optimization without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8615355B2Multifactor charging for electric vehicles
Publication Date: 2013.12.24 GENERAL MOTORS LLC
  • US8615355B2 patent drawing
  • US8615355B2 patent drawing
  • US8615355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The described method and system improve electric-power driving range for electric vehicles, i.e., electric-only, hybrid electric, and other vehicles that draw electrical power from an on-board storage system for propulsion. The described system uses synergy among selected data sources to provide charging prompts and route assistance to allow the vehicle user to operate his or her vehicle in a more economical fashion by ensuring timely and cost effective charging.