EV Charging Station Load Monitoring for Real-Time Power Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The limited number and location of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations pose a significant challenge for EV owners, necessitating altered travel plans and hindering the growth of EV adoption.

Innovation Solution

An EV charging station equipped with load monitoring circuitry, AI and ML algorithms, and real-time power adjustment capabilities to optimize charging power based on available load and safety margins, integrated with security features and automated billing, enabling efficient and safe charging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If EV charging stations are deployed in limited locations, then charging infrastructure is established, but EV owners face travel planning limitations and reduced accessibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of charging stationsVSAvoidtravel planning flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The charging station implements dynamic power adjustment capabilities, allowing it to adapt its charging rate based on real-time grid conditions, load availability, and safety margins. This dynamic operation enables the station to function effectively in various deployment scenarios, maximizing the utility of each installed station and reducing the need for additional fixed-location infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters in real-time, including power output levels, charging rates, and safety margins, based on AI/ML predictions and current grid conditions. This parameter adaptability allows the charging station to optimize performance across different locations and time periods, effectively addressing the limited deployment quantity by maximizing each station's operational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If real-time power adjustment is implemented based on load monitoring, then charging efficiency is optimized, but system complexity increases due to AI/ML algorithms and safety margin calculations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charging station incorporates continuous feedback loops where load monitoring circuitry measures current load, the processor receives this data, calculates safety margins using AI/ML algorithms, and adjusts power output accordingly. This closed-loop feedback system optimizes charging efficiency by adapting to real-time conditions while managing system complexity through automated control algorithms that learn from historical data and improve over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment of charging parameters based on automated safety margin calculations and load conditions. The AI/ML models autonomously determine optimal power levels without requiring manual intervention, allowing the system to self-manage its operational complexity while maintaining high charging efficiency through intelligent, adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If safety margin is dynamically calculated using AI/ML algorithms, then charging safety is enhanced, but computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging safetyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of safety margins based on historical data and predicted load conditions before actual charging sessions begin. The AI/ML algorithms pre-process and analyze patterns to establish baseline safety parameters, reducing the computational burden during real-time charging operations and minimizing processing delays while maintaining high safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system calculates safety margins with a degree of conservatism, using AI/ML to determine appropriate safety buffers that may be slightly more conservative than minimum requirements. This approach ensures enhanced safety while the algorithms learn to optimize the balance between computational effort and safety margin accuracy over time, reducing unnecessary processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250289339A1Electric vehicle charging station
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 EV BUDDY INC
  • US20250289339A1 patent drawing
  • US20250289339A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station includes a charging apparatus providing electrical power to an electric vehicle (EV). The EV charging station may include a power panel having: load monitoring circuitry configured to measure a current load available at the power panel. Moreover, the device may include processor circuitry configured to: calculate a maximum power available for the charging apparatus, determine a margin of safety for charging the EV, where the margin of safety is at least one of user-configured parameters and dynamically calculated parameters based on an artificial intelligence (AI) model and machine learning (ML) algorithms, and adjust, in real-time, power supplied to the charging apparatus based on the measured current load and the determined margin of safety.