EV Charging Station Power Prioritization for Renewable Energy Use

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electric vehicle charging infrastructure faces challenges in efficiently managing energy demand, particularly in balancing the needs of electric vehicle charging stations with renewable energy sources and building energy requirements, while minimizing energy losses and optimizing the use of renewable energy production.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic management method for electrical consumption that prioritizes energy allocation to electric vehicle charging stations and buildings, utilizing renewable energy sources and energy storage, with smart metering and remote supervision to optimize energy flow and minimize losses during AC/DC conversions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If fast charging is provided to electric vehicles, then charging time is reduced, but energy losses increase due to AC/DC conversions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging timeVSAvoidenergy losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The charging infrastructure is segmented into DC charging points (direct connection to renewable sources, no conversion losses) and AC charging points (with full conversion capability). This segmentation allows the system to optimize energy efficiency for fast charging while maintaining versatility for all charging needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A smart management system acts as an intermediary between renewable energy sources and charging points, dynamically routing energy flows to minimize AC/DC conversions. The system prioritizes direct DC charging when renewable energy is available, using AC/DC conversion only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If renewable energy sources are used to power charging stations, then carbon emissions are reduced, but energy supply reliability decreases due to intermittency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon emissionsVSAvoidenergy supply reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The charging station operates dynamically, adapting its energy source selection based on real-time renewable energy availability. The system continuously monitors renewable energy production and adjusts charging operations to maximize renewable usage while ensuring reliability through fallback options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (charging power levels, energy source selection) based on renewable energy availability. When renewable energy is abundant, the system operates at higher efficiency; when availability drops, it adjusts to maintain reliable service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple charging points are provided in the station, then service capacity increases, but energy management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice capacityVSAvoidenergy management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The smart management system provides universal control over all charging points, handling multiple functions (energy routing, load balancing, renewable energy optimization) through a single integrated platform. This reduces the effective complexity by consolidating management tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The energy management system operates autonomously, making real-time decisions about energy distribution without requiring manual intervention. The system self-regulates power allocation across multiple charging points based on demand and renewable energy availability, reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If AC charging is used for electric vehicles, then charging infrastructure simplicity is maintained, but charging speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfrastructure simplicityVSAvoidcharging speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The charging infrastructure is divided into AC and DC charging points, each serving different needs. DC charging points provide fast charging capability without requiring complex on-board vehicle converters, while AC points maintain simplicity for slower charging scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4230473A1Dynamic prioritization of power consumptions within a charging station for slow and fast charging electric vehicles based on renewable energy sources
Publication Date: 2023.08.23 DREAM ENERGY
  • EP4230473A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4230473A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4230473A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for dynamically prioritizing the electricity consumption of a system comprising a renewable energy production unit, for example a photovoltaic system (8), a building including a rest area (4), an energy storage system (5), and charging points for an electric vehicle charging station (2). The method divides electricity production according to the priorities of the participants (building, storage, charging points) while optimizing the gains from renewable energy production.