EV Charging Station Pricing Using Usage Statistics by Time Zone

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to efficiently manage and utilize electric energy generated by EV charging stations, leading to waste and inefficiency due to lack of dynamic pricing based on usage statistics.

Innovation Solution

An EV ecosystem management device determines electric energy values by time zone, setting prices with discounts and surcharges based on charging station usage statistics, considering total charging amounts and reference levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If electric energy prices are fixed without considering usage statistics, then pricing simplicity is maintained, but electric energy waste increases due to inability to optimize usage patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectric energy wasteVSAvoidpricing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic pricing by adjusting electric energy prices based on real-time usage statistics and time zones. The system dynamically modifies pricing parameters (discount rates, surcharge rates) according to charging station utilization patterns, transforming the static pricing system into a dynamic one that adapts to changing conditions to reduce energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback mechanism where usage statistics from charging stations are continuously collected, analyzed, and used to adjust pricing strategies. The management device receives usage data, determines appropriate discount and surcharge rates based on this feedback, and implements price adjustments that reflect actual usage patterns, creating a closed-loop system that reduces energy waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If dynamic pricing based on usage statistics is implemented, then electric energy efficiency increases, but pricing system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectric energy efficiencyVSAvoidpricing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the pricing system into distinct time zones and charging station groups, allowing independent pricing strategies for different segments. By dividing the overall system into manageable segments (time-based segments and location-based segments), the complexity is distributed and controlled while achieving high overall efficiency through localized optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes pricing parameters (discount rates, surcharge rates, base prices) based on usage statistics and time zones. The management device adjusts these parameters dynamically to optimize energy efficiency, transforming fixed parameters into variable ones that respond to usage patterns, thereby improving productivity through parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If uniform pricing is applied across all charging stations, then operational simplicity is maintained, but energy utilization optimization is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing management easeVSAvoidunused electric energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing location-specific pricing strategies for different charging stations based on their individual usage statistics. Each charging station receives customized pricing (discounts or surcharges) tailored to its local usage patterns, transforming the uniform pricing approach into a localized one that optimizes energy utilization at each specific location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of energy

If time-based price variations are implemented, then energy usage optimization improves, but pricing calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunused electric energyVSAvoidpricing calculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by dividing time into distinct zones (peak, off-peak, valley periods) and applying different pricing strategies to each period. This periodic structure simplifies the calculation complexity by using repeating patterns rather than continuous complex calculations, while still achieving energy optimization through time-based price variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250363515A1Method for determining electric energy value by considering electric energy usage statistics in ev eco-system, and device for performing method
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 AIZEN GLOBAL CO INC
  • US20250363515A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363515A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363515A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for determining an electric energy value by considering electric energy usage statistics in an EV eco-system, and a device for performing the method. The method for determining an electric energy value by considering electric energy usage statistics in an EV eco-system may comprise steps in which an EV eco-system management device: determines electric energy usage statistics on the basis of EV eco-data received from each of a plurality of EV charging stations; and determines, by time period, the price at which electric energy is to be sold at each of the plurality of EV charging stations.