EV Charging Task Matching System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electric vehicle (EV) drivers experience downtime during charging, which reduces their earnings potential, as EV charging can take up to an hour or more, and existing systems lack efficient methods to optimize task matching and routing for EVs to minimize this downtime.

Innovation Solution

A network computing system that receives EV data on charge levels and range, optimizes task matching, and determines optimal charging times and locations for EV drivers, allowing them to perform tasks while their vehicles are charging, thereby reducing downtime and increasing earnings opportunities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If EV drivers wait for charging to complete before taking new tasks, then the vehicle has sufficient charge for continuous operation, but driver earnings and productivity decrease due to idle downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle charge sufficiencyVSAvoiddriver earnings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary routing optimization by identifying and assigning follow-up tasks to drivers before their current charging cycle completes. The server analyzes driver locations, charging station proximity, and task availability to pre-assign tasks that can be performed during or immediately after charging, ensuring continuous productivity without waiting for charge completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous useful action by allowing drivers to perform delivery or pickup tasks during the charging period. By integrating task assignment with charging schedules, the system ensures that drivers remain productive throughout the entire charging duration, transforming what would be idle time into revenue-generating activity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Reliability

If EV drivers are assigned tasks that require traveling to charging stations, then charging infrastructure utilization improves, but task completion time and routing efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging infrastructure utilizationVSAvoidtask completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the charging activity with task execution by assigning tasks that coincide with charging periods. Drivers perform deliveries or pickups at locations near charging stations while their vehicles are charging, combining two necessary activities into a single time window and eliminating separate travel time for charging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as an intermediary that optimizes routing by identifying charging stations located near task destinations or along efficient routing paths. By mediating between driver locations, charging infrastructure, and task assignments, the system minimizes additional travel distance and time while ensuring adequate charging opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the system optimizes routing for EV drivers considering charge levels and charging station locations, then driver downtime reduces, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver operational efficiencyVSAvoidrouting optimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring driver charge levels, locations, and task completion status. This real-time data feeds back into the routing optimization algorithm, allowing dynamic adjustment of task assignments and routing recommendations to maximize productivity while ensuring drivers maintain adequate charge levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by focusing optimization on key parameters such as driver charge level thresholds, charging station proximity distances, and task priority weights. By controlling the number and type of parameters considered in routing decisions, the system achieves effective optimization without requiring excessively complex computational models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230153720A1Management of operations using electric vehicle data
Publication Date: 2023.05.18 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20230153720A1 patent drawing
  • US20230153720A1 patent drawing
  • US20230153720A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system can receive EV data of an EV operated by a driver, where the EV data comprises at least one of a current electric charge of the EV or a current range of the EV. The system can further receive service requests from requesting users, where a subset of the service requests correspond to one or more item pickup locations within a predetermined distance or estimated time of travel of an EV charging station. Based at least in part on the EV data, the system (i) assigns the driver to the subset of service requests, and (ii) determines a route from a location of the EV to the EV charging station, and transmits information corresponding to the subset of service requests and data corresponding to the route to at least one of a computing device operated by the driver or a computing system associated with the EV.