EV Charging Control Sequence for Time-Cost Tradeoffs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electric vehicle (EV) charging methods are inflexible and lack intelligence, as they follow a fixed charge control sequence that cannot be adjusted according to user demands, resulting in a low degree of intelligence in charge control.

Innovation Solution

A method for vehicle charge control that involves acquiring a proportional relationship between estimated charging cost and time and a target charging quantity of electricity, determining the estimated charging cost and time, and then determining an actual control sequence for performing the charge control based on these factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed charge control sequence is used, then the charging process is simple to implement, but the intelligence degree and adaptability to user demands are low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user demandsVSAvoidcomplexity of charge control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charging control sequence is transformed from a fixed static pattern to a dynamic adjustable sequence. The system allows real-time modification of charging parameters including charging power, charging current, and charging voltage based on user-selected modes (fast charging, standard charging, economical charging) and battery state, making the control system adaptable while maintaining manageable complexity through predefined modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements adaptability by changing key charging parameters (charging power, current, voltage) according to different user demands and battery conditions. The control system adjusts these parameters dynamically based on selected charging modes and real-time battery state, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If charging is performed without considering cost and time proportions, then the charging process is straightforward, but the ability to balance charging time and cost is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of charging operationVSAvoidcharging time optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of the proportional relationship between charging cost and charging time before the actual charging process. By pre-establishing this relationship and allowing users to select charging modes based on their preferences, the system enables informed decision-making about charging time and cost trade-offs without complicating the actual charging operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor charging progress, cost accumulation, and time elapsed in real-time. This feedback allows the system to adjust charging parameters dynamically to optimize the balance between charging time and cost while maintaining ease of operation through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If the charging control does not consider user demands, then the control system is simple, but the user experience is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of charge controlVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charging control system provides self-service functionality by automatically selecting and adjusting charging parameters based on user-selected modes and real-time battery state. The system autonomously manages the charging process without requiring continuous user intervention, enhancing automation while keeping the interface simple for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves high automation through dynamic adjustment of charging parameters based on multiple inputs including user-selected modes, battery state of charge, and real-time conditions. This dynamic automation resolves the contradiction by making the system highly responsive to user demands while managing complexity through structured control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250026228A1Method for Vehicle Charging Control, Device, and Storage Medium
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 BEIJING CO WHEELS TECH CO LTD
  • US20250026228A1 patent drawing
  • US20250026228A1 patent drawing
  • US20250026228A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for vehicle charge control includes: acquiring a proportional relationship between an estimated charging cost and an estimated charging time and a target charging quantity of electricity; determining the estimated charging cost and the estimated charging time according to the target charging quantity of electricity and the proportional relationship between the estimated charging cost and the estimated charging time; and determining an actual control sequence for performing an actual charge control on the vehicle according to the target charging quantity of electricity, the estimated charging cost and the estimated charging time, in which the actual control sequence is a sequence consisting of control signals issued to a component related to charging of the vehicle when the vehicle is charged.