EV Battery and Cabin Cooling With Suction Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electric vehicle cooling systems face challenges in maintaining uninterrupted and smooth thermal management, particularly when transitioning between cabin-only, battery-only, and hybrid cooling modes, leading to fluctuations in cabin and battery coolant temperatures and compressor operation delays.

Innovation Solution

A control circuitry-based method that determines a compressor suction pressure target and generates control signals using feedforward and feedback signals to adjust compressor suction pressure, allowing for seamless transitions between cooling modes and minimizing disturbances to the cabin and battery systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the cooling system transitions between cabin-only, battery-only, and hybrid cooling modes, then the system can meet diverse cooling demands, but temperature fluctuations and compressor operation delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling mode adaptabilityVSAvoidtemperature stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by determining a target compressor suction pressure in advance before mode transitions occur. This target pressure is calculated based on anticipated cooling demands and used to generate feedforward control signals that proactively adjust compressor operation, preventing temperature fluctuations rather than reacting to them after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring actual compressor suction pressure and comparing it to the target suction pressure. Feedback signals are generated based on the difference between actual and target values, and these signals are combined with feedforward signals to dynamically adjust compressor control, ensuring stable operation during mode transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If traditional cooling control methods are used, then the system structure remains simple, but compressor operation delays and cooling interruptions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidcooling response efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary calculation of the target compressor suction pressure based on anticipated cooling requirements before mode transitions. This advance determination allows the compressor to be pre-positioned for optimal performance, eliminating delays that would occur with reactive control methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts compressor control by combining feedforward and feedback signals in real-time. The control approach transitions from static, simple control to dynamic control that adapts to changing cooling demands while maintaining smooth operation, improving response efficiency without requiring complex hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If feedforward and feedback control signals are combined for precise compressor control, then temperature stability improves, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature stabilityVSAvoidcontrol signal processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback control by monitoring actual compressor suction pressure and generating correction signals based on the difference from target values. This feedback mechanism provides automatic stabilization, maintaining temperature stability while using standard control components rather than complex custom-designed control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The target compressor suction pressure serves as an intermediary parameter that mediates between cooling demands and compressor control. By using this intermediate target value, the system decouples the complex relationship between multiple cooling requirements and compressor operation, simplifying the control architecture while achieving precise temperature stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12103431B2System and methods for battery and cabin cooling in electric vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 RIVIAN HOLDINGS LLC
  • US12103431B2 patent drawing
  • US12103431B2 patent drawing
  • US12103431B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a vehicle cooling system for cooling a cabin and a battery system, each having a respective target operating range. The cooling system is configured to select among a cabin-only mode, battery-only mode, or a hybrid cooling mode for cooling the cabin and the battery system. In the hybrid mode, the system determines a desired pressure at an inlet of a compressor corresponding to a suction pressure of the compressor, to avoid cooling interruptions. The system generates a control signal based on the desired suction pressure, and applies the control signal to the compressor. Generating the control signal may include generating a feedforward signal the desired suction pressure, generating a feedback signal based on the suction pressure, or a combination thereof. For example, the use of hybrid mode based on suction pressure allows smoother response to targets with reduced delays in response in meeting the cooling demands.