Fleet Management System for EV Charging Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing electric vehicle fleets is challenging due to varying vehicle capabilities and charging infrastructure, which affects recharging time and fleet readiness, leading to difficulties in assigning vehicles to tasks and understanding the implications of internal and external changes on fleet status.

Innovation Solution

A fleet management system that detects trigger events, provides prompts and decision options to fleet operators via an interface, and receives inputs to adjust charging strategies, communicating instructions to charging stations to optimize vehicle charging and meet deadlines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If electric vehicles are recharged using traditional charging infrastructure, then vehicles can be powered sustainably, but recharging time is measured in hours causing fleet readiness issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesustainable energy useVSAvoidrecharging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future charging needs of vehicles based on scheduled tasks and current battery levels. It proactively identifies vehicles that will require charging before their tasks begin, allowing charging to be initiated in advance during off-peak hours or lower-cost periods, thus reducing wait time while maintaining sustainable energy use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts charging strategies based on real-time conditions including vehicle location, task schedules, battery state, and charging station availability. It continuously optimizes charging timing and location assignments to minimize fleet downtime while utilizing available sustainable charging infrastructure efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If fleet operators manually manage charging assignments, then control over vehicle deployment is maintained, but scheduling complexity increases and operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual controlVSAvoidscheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor vehicle battery levels, scheduled tasks, charging station status, and fleet utilization metrics. This feedback automatically informs charging assignments and schedule adjustments, reducing manual intervention complexity while preserving operator oversight and control capabilities through centralized visibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing vehicles to be automatically assigned to charging stations based on their needs and fleet priorities without manual operator intervention for each assignment. The automated system handles the complex scheduling while operators retain strategic control through configuration and monitoring interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If charging stations are distributed widely to support fleet operations, then vehicle availability improves, but infrastructure cost and management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle availabilityVSAvoidinfrastructure management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system treats charging stations as universal resources that can serve multiple vehicles with different requirements. It creates a unified charging network where any compatible vehicle can access any available charging station, maximizing utilization of existing infrastructure while reducing the need for dedicated charging points at each fleet location

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The fleet management system acts as an intermediary between vehicles and charging stations, coordinating assignments and monitoring status. This intermediary layer simplifies infrastructure management by providing centralized control over distributed charging assets, enabling efficient allocation without requiring direct manual management of each station

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of time

If fast charging infrastructure is deployed to reduce recharging time, then fleet readiness improves, but compatibility issues arise with different vehicle types and charging standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecharging timeVSAvoidcharging compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system adapts charging parameters dynamically based on vehicle-specific requirements including battery type, maximum charging rate, and connector compatibility. It adjusts charging speed, power delivery characteristics, and station selection to match each vehicle's capabilities, enabling efficient charging across diverse fleet compositions without compatibility issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240177078A1Fleet management tools for charging station optimization
Publication Date: 2024.05.30 POWERFLEX SYST INC
  • US20240177078A1 patent drawing
  • US20240177078A1 patent drawing
  • US20240177078A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain aspects of the present disclosure provide techniques for managing a fleet of electric vehicles. An example method includes detecting a trigger event that affects charging characteristics of at least one vehicle in a fleet. The method also includes providing, via an interface, a prompt regarding the trigger event. The method includes presenting, via the interface, decisions to remedy the cause of the triggering event and consequences of the decisions to the charging characteristics of one or more vehicles in the fleet. Additionally, the method includes receiving, via the interface, an input accepting one of the decisions. The method includes providing instructions that affect the operation of at least one charging station based on the accepted decision.