Electric Vehicle Fleet Charging Control System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for charging electric vehicle fleets do not effectively manage energy costs based on prevailing utility rates and the state of charge of vehicles, leading to inefficiencies and increased operational expenses.

Innovation Solution

A control system that integrates with electric buses and charging stations to optimize charging schedules based on real-time energy tariffs, vehicle state of charge, and operational data, using energy storage devices to shift charging to lower-cost periods and adjust charging rates to minimize overall energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If fast-charge battery systems are employed to enable quick charging, then recharge time is reduced, but the range of the vehicle between recharges decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecharge timeVSAvoidrange
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by charging batteries during off-peak hours when energy costs are lower and demand is reduced. The control system schedules charging operations in advance based on predicted usage patterns, allowing vehicles to be charged during periods of low demand and then ready for service during peak periods, thus resolving the contradiction between quick charging availability and energy cost efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If charging stations are provided at every bus stop to enable frequent recharging, then operational flexibility is improved, but system complexity and infrastructure cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidinfrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system provides multi-functionality by serving multiple purposes: it optimizes charging schedules based on energy costs, monitors battery state of charge across the fleet, predicts vehicle usage patterns, and coordinates charging operations across multiple locations. This centralized intelligent control replaces the need for physical charging infrastructure at every stop, achieving operational flexibility through software-based coordination rather than widespread physical deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If vehicles are charged during peak energy rate periods to ensure availability, then vehicle availability is improved, but energy cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle availabilityVSAvoidenergy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary charging actions during off-peak hours when energy rates are lower. The control system predicts when vehicles will be needed and schedules charging operations in advance during periods of low energy cost and low demand, ensuring vehicles are ready for service without incurring peak rate costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic charging cycles that alternate between charging during off-peak periods and operational periods. By rhythmically charging during low-demand periods and operating during high-demand periods, the system achieves reliable vehicle availability while minimizing energy costs through periodic synchronization with utility rate cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Speed

If the charging rate is increased to reduce recharge time, then charging speed is improved, but energy cost and demand on the grid increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging speedVSAvoidenergy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic action by alternating between high-speed charging during off-peak periods when grid demand is low and slower charging during peak periods. This rhythmic charging pattern allows the system to achieve fast charging when it provides the most value (during low-cost periods) while avoiding the penalties of high-demand periods, thus resolving the contradiction between charging speed and energy cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP2957450B1Charging of a fleet of electric vehicles
Publication Date: 2021.10.13 PROTERRA INC
  • EP2957450B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2957450B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP2957450B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A method for controlling the charging of multiple electric vehicles operating in a geographic area may include inputting a tariff schedule into a control system. The tariff schedule may identify the cost of energy at different times in the geographic area. The method may also include receiving data from the multiple electric vehicles. The data may include at least the state of charge of the vehicle. The method may further include sending instructions to at least one vehicle of the multiple electric vehicles. The instructions may include directives on charging based at least on the tariff schedule and the received data.