Multi-Axle EV Drivetrain Lash Transition Control for Clunk Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-motor electric vehicles with separate drivetrains experience clunk and shuffle due to differing backlash and compliance in front and rear axles, exacerbated by CAN communication delays, leading to uncomfortable noise and vehicle jerking.

Innovation Solution

A coordinated torque shaping control strategy is implemented across independent electronic controllers for each axle, transitioning the prime movers through lash zones sequentially to minimize clunk and shuffle, accounting for CAN delays and axle-specific parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If torque is applied rapidly in response to accelerator pedal input, then vehicle acceleration response is improved, but clunk and shuffle phenomena occur due to rapid backlash traversal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration response speedVSAvoidclunk and shuffle noise
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary action by detecting when the drivetrain is approaching the lash zone and proactively adjusting the torque rate of change before the backlash is traversed. This prevents rapid lash crossing by pre-modifying the torque profile, thereby eliminating clunk and shuffle while maintaining acceptable acceleration response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the torque parameter by adjusting the rate of change of torque (dT/dt) based on drivetrain state. When approaching lash zone, the torque slope is reduced; when clear of lash zone, normal torque application resumes. This parameter modulation eliminates harmful noise while preserving acceleration performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If torque shaping is applied to minimize clunk by slowing traversal through lash zone, then noise is reduced, but acceleration response becomes sluggish

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclunk noiseVSAvoidacceleration response
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts torque shaping based on real-time drivetrain state. Rather than applying constant torque limiting, the system actively monitors lash zone proximity and modulates torque rate of change accordingly. This dynamic approach minimizes clunk only when necessary, preserving acceleration response during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from drivetrain state estimation (including lash zone detection) to continuously adjust torque application. This closed-loop control ensures torque shaping is applied selectively based on actual drivetrain conditions, preventing clunk when needed while maintaining responsive acceleration when the drivetrain is in a favorable state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If distributed control is used for front and rear motors, then system complexity is reduced and modularity is improved, but CAN communication delays cause clunk and shuffle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system modularityVSAvoidclunk and shuffle due to communication delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into independent motor controllers that each operate with local decision-making capability. Each controller independently monitors its own drivetrain state and applies torque shaping locally, eliminating the need for synchronized communication across the CAN network. This segmentation preserves modularity while eliminating communication-delay-induced clunk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each motor controller serves itself by independently detecting lash zone conditions and adjusting its own torque output without requiring commands from a central controller. This self-service approach eliminates dependency on CAN communication timing, allowing each axle to optimize its own torque application and avoid clunk caused by communication delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If wheel-end disconnect hubs are installed on one axle, then drivetrain flexibility and efficiency are improved, but backlash increases leading to more clunk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrivetrain flexibilityVSAvoidincreased backlash and clunk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control system applies localized torque shaping to the specific axle with the wheel-end disconnect hub. Rather than uniformly controlling both axles, the system identifies which axle has the disconnect hub and applies lash-zone-aware torque modulation only to that axle. This local quality approach compensates for the increased backlash at the disconnect hub while preserving the efficiency benefits of the flexible drivetrain configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12391125B2System and method to coordinate lash crossing transitions in multi-axle electrified drivetrains
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12391125B2 patent drawing
  • US12391125B2 patent drawing
  • US12391125B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for an electric vehicle are provided. In one example, a method for an electric vehicle having a first prime mover for supplying a torque to a first axle and a second prime mover for supplying a torque to a second axle comprises transitioning the first prime mover and the second prime mover to cross a lash zone one before the other, where the lash zone of the second prime mover does not overlap with the lash zone of the first prime mover. In one example, the first prime mover is controlled with a first electronic controller and the second prime mover is controlled with a second electronic controller positioned separately in the vehicle from the first electronic controller. In one example, the method further comprises communicating information from the first electronic controller to the second electronic controller via a communication area network.