EV Power Prediction Model Error Feedback Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric vehicle power consumption prediction models struggle to accurately calculate power usage due to unaccounted factors like driver skill and other difficult-to-quantify variables, leading to inaccurate predictions.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that calculates power consumption predictions using a prediction model incorporating error data from past movements, allowing for more accurate forecasting by adjusting for factors not initially considered.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If a mathematical model using observation values (traveling distance, speed, temperature) is used to predict power consumption, then the prediction can be calculated in advance, but the prediction accuracy deteriorates due to unaccounted factors like driver skill

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction timingVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects actual power consumption data from past movements and uses it to update the prediction model through error calculation. The error between predicted and actual values is fed back into the model to improve future predictions, allowing the system to account for factors like driver skill that were initially unquantified.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The prediction model is updated in advance using historical data before new predictions are made. By pre-calculating errors from past movements and incorporating them into the model, the system prepares improved prediction capabilities ahead of time, maintaining both advance prediction timing and improved accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If traditional mathematical models are used, then the model structure remains simple, but the ability to reflect difficult-to-quantify factors deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel structureVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms unquantifiable factors into usable parameters by calculating prediction errors from actual data. Instead of directly measuring difficult-to-quantify factors like driver skill, the system uses the difference between predicted and actual power consumption as a parameter that captures their effect, maintaining model simplicity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The prediction error serves as an intermediary that bridges the gap between simple mathematical models and complex real-world factors. Rather than directly incorporating difficult-to-measure variables, the error metric mediates their influence on the prediction model, allowing simple models to reflect complex realities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230204669A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, computer program product, and moving object
Publication Date: 2023.06.29 KK TOSHIBA
  • US20230204669A1 patent drawing
  • US20230204669A1 patent drawing
  • US20230204669A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, an information processing apparatus includes one or more hardware processors configured to calculate a prediction value of an amount of electric power consumed for a movement to be predicted, based on a prediction model in which the amount of electric power consumed by a moving object is an objective variable, one or more factor values that affect the amount of electric power consumed for the movement of the moving object to be predicted, and an error between the prediction value obtained by the prediction model and an actual measured value.