EV Power Distribution Prioritization for 48V Battery Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electrified vehicles face challenges in sustaining continuous power to electric motors, particularly in mild-HEVs with smaller 48V batteries, leading to competition among vehicle systems for power and potential inability to deliver constant power in certain conditions.

Innovation Solution

A power management system that includes a high voltage power source and a control module capable of prioritizing power distribution based on assigned priorities to vehicle subsystems, distinguishing between closed loop, open loop, high voltage, and low voltage subsystems, and adjusting these priorities based on vehicle status.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If a smaller 48V battery is used in mild-HEVs, then vehicle weight and cost are reduced, but the battery cannot sustain continuous electrical power to the electric motor in certain conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle weightVSAvoidcontinuous power output
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts power distribution priorities based on real-time vehicle status and demand conditions. The control module continuously monitors power requests from multiple subsystems and reconfigures power allocation dynamically, allowing the smaller battery to adapt its power delivery to match actual vehicle needs rather than being designed for peak continuous output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the power system by introducing priority-based power distribution. Instead of designing the battery for worst-case continuous power scenarios, the system modifies how power is allocated by assigning different priority levels to various subsystems, allowing the same battery to serve multiple functions effectively under varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If multiple vehicle subsystems compete for power from the same high voltage source, then system integration is simplified, but critical functions may not receive sufficient power during peak demand

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower distribution system complexityVSAvoidpower supply reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The power distribution system is segmented into multiple priority levels, with each vehicle subsystem assigned to a specific priority tier. This segmentation allows the control module to systematically manage power allocation by first satisfying high-priority critical functions, then allocating remaining power to lower-priority subsystems, ensuring reliability without requiring an overly complex distribution architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control module acts as an intermediary between the high voltage power source and multiple competing subsystems. It receives power requests from various subsystems, applies priority-based filtering and allocation logic, and manages power distribution accordingly. This intermediary function resolves the conflict between simplified system integration and reliable power supply for critical functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If power is allocated without prioritization to all subsystems equally, then system fairness is maintained, but critical safety functions may be inhibited during power shortages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower allocation fairnessVSAvoidcritical function availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static equal power allocation to dynamic priority-based allocation. The control module continuously adjusts power distribution based on real-time vehicle status, ensuring that critical safety functions receive adequate power when needed while maintaining fair allocation for non-critical subsystems under normal conditions. This dynamic approach preserves both fairness and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality levels of power allocation are applied to different subsystems based on their criticality. Critical safety functions receive guaranteed high-priority power allocation, while non-critical comfort and convenience features receive lower priority allocation. This local differentiation of allocation quality ensures critical functions are never inhibited while maintaining overall system fairness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11142151B2Prioritization of electric vehicle power distribution
Publication Date: 2021.10.12 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US11142151B2 patent drawing
  • US11142151B2 patent drawing
  • US11142151B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power management system for a vehicle includes a high voltage power source configured to provide power to vehicle subsystems, and at least one control module operably coupled to the high voltage power source and configured to receive power demand requests from the vehicle subsystems, and prioritize supply of power from the high voltage power source based on an assigned priority associated with each of the received power demand requests. The assigned priority may vary based on vehicle status.