EV Route Proposal Using Ground Charging Energy Projection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for powering electric vehicles through noncontact ground power supply apparatuses may not provide sufficient power for vehicles to reach their destinations, especially if the power supply sections are too short.

Innovation Solution

A running mode proposal device that selects a first running route based on a predetermined algorithm and projects the electric energy supplied by ground power supply apparatuses along this route. If the projected energy is less than a standard energy requirement, the device selects a second route with longer power supply sections to ensure sufficient energy is received.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the transmitted power at ground power supply apparatuses is increased to the limit, then the power supply capability is improved, but the power supply section length must be sufficiently long to provide adequate total energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmitted powerVSAvoidpower supply section length
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the vehicle's running speed within a control section to optimize power reception. By controlling the vehicle to run at a speed that maintains resonance frequency alignment between ground and vehicle power supply apparatuses, the system maximizes power transfer efficiency without requiring increased transmitted power or longer power supply sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by controlling vehicle speed to match resonance frequencies. This parameter adjustment enables efficient power transfer at existing power levels and section lengths, resolving the contradiction between power magnitude and section length requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If a route is selected based on shortest distance or fastest time, then travel efficiency is improved, but the power supply section length may be insufficient for the vehicle to reach destination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel timeVSAvoidpower supply sufficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of power supply adequacy before route selection. By projecting whether sufficient power can be supplied along candidate routes and determining necessary control sections in advance, the system selects routes that guarantee power sufficiency while maintaining travel efficiency, rather than discovering power deficiencies after route selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary evaluation process that assesses power supply conditions between the route selection and actual travel. This intermediary calculation determines whether candidate routes have adequate power supply sections, acting as a mediator that ensures both travel efficiency and power reliability are satisfied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If the vehicle running speed is increased, then travel time is reduced, but the power reception efficiency from ground power supply apparatuses decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle running speedVSAvoidpower reception efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically controls vehicle speed to maintain resonance frequency alignment with ground power supply apparatuses. By adjusting speed within a control section to match the resonance frequency of the power transfer system, the vehicle maximizes power reception efficiency while still progressing toward the destination, rather than maintaining constant high speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Power

If the transmitted power is maximized, then immediate power supply capability is improved, but the total energy available for long-distance travel remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmitted powerVSAvoidtotal electric energy
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary projection calculations to determine whether maximizing transmitted power will provide sufficient total energy for the entire journey. By evaluating power supply adequacy before travel and identifying control sections where speed adjustment can enhance power reception, the system ensures both maximum power utilization and sufficient total energy accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution ensures that electric vehicles can receive the necessary power from ground power supply apparatuses, enabling them to reach their destinations without running out of charge.

Implementation Method 1

power is supplied by noncontact from a ground power supply apparatus on the running route to the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12306001B2Running mode proposal device, navigation device, and running control device
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12306001B2 patent drawing
  • US12306001B2 patent drawing
  • US12306001B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A running mode proposal device for proposing a running mode up to a destination of a vehicle is configured to: select a first running route by a predetermined algorithm unrelated to noncontact power supply; project, when assuming the vehicle runs on a predetermined running route, a value of a parameter relating to an electric energy projected as being supplied at a power supply section on the running route to the vehicle; select a second running route by which a projected supplied electric energy will be greater than a predetermined standard electric energy if the projected value of the parameter when assuming the vehicle runs on the first running route is a value indicating the projected supplied electric energy is less than the standard electric energy; and propose, as the running route, the first running route, and, when the second running route is selected, further proposing a second running route.